Evaluation of risk factors of diagnostic failure in fine needle biopsy in pulmonary nodules; conventional computed tomography versus computed tomography flouroscopy

dc.contributor.authorKolu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, İsmail Okan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T08:50:27Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T08:50:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Aim of this study was to determine the risk factors of diagnostic failure of o fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) procedures under the guidance of conventional computed tomography (CCT) and CT fluoroscopy (CTF) comparing their diagnostic performance by single operator in pulmonary lesions. Total of 241 patients underwent FNAB procedure (123 CCT guided and 118 CTF-guided). All pulmonary nodules were classified by size (?10 mm, 11-20 mm, 21-30 mm and >30 mm) and diagnostic yield was calculated according to the lesion size. Independent risk factors for diagnostic performance of CCT and CTF-guided FNAB were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CCT-guided FNAB were 88.2%, 100%, 100%, 70%, and 90.7%, respectively. For CTF-guided FNAB were 91.4%, 100%, 100%, 79.4%, and 93.5%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, small lesions (OR 1,096; 95% CI, 1.045- 1.148 p<0.001) and lesions without pleural contact (OR 1.661; 95% CI, 1.414-1,951 p<0.001) were found to be significant independent risk factors for CCT-guided FNAB procedure. No independent risk factor was determined for CTF-guided FNAB. Small nodule size and lack of contact with pleura are independent risk factors associated with diagnostic failure and may decrease diagnostic accuracy of CCT Guided FNAB. However, real-time imaging capability of CT fluoroscopy increases diagnostic accuracy in difficult pulmonary nodules.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKOLU M,YILDIRIM İ. O (2020). Evaluation of risk factors of diagnostic failure in fine needle biopsy in pulmonary nodules; conventional computed tomography versus computed tomography flouroscopy. Medicine Science, 9(3), 742 - 748. Doi: 10.5455/medscience.2020.06.103en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2020.06.103en_US
dc.identifier.endpage748en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-0634
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage742en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid367580en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2020.06.103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/19636
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/367580
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of risk factors of diagnostic failure in fine needle biopsy in pulmonary nodules; conventional computed tomography versus computed tomography flouroscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
804.78 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Doyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: