Recommendations for the ethical guidelines for publication of scientific studies: The responsibilities of editors, reviewers and the authors

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAkbulut, Sami/0000-0002-6864-7711
dc.authoridSAHIN, TEVFIK TOLGA/0000-0002-9132-6115
dc.authorwosidAkbulut, Sami/L-9568-2014
dc.authorwosidSAHIN, TEVFIK TOLGA/W-2539-2017
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Sami
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Tevfik Tolga
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:50:51Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:50:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to evaluate the role of anesthesiologist in the management of hydatid disease from the perspective of the editors, reviewers and the authors. Methods: We searched the PubMed/Medline database using the following keywords: (hydatid* OR echinococc*) AND (disease OR cyst) AND (anesthesiology). We have evaluated the authors, their institutions and department, and the aim of the studies. We also evaluated the studies published by anesthesiologists in terms of content. Results: The literature search showed 6344 articles published between February 2010 to 2021. Sixty-three had at least one anesthesiologist in the author list. Anesthesiologists were leading authors in 35 studies; and in 19 of them, all the authors were anesthesiologist. Sixteen (84.2%) of these articles defined the outcomes of surgical therapy and there was no information regarding anesthesia technique. Conclusion: The results of our study emphasize an important controversy regarding jurisdiction of different departments in terms of scientific research ethics. We believe that different disciplines can work together to evaluate a scientific problem and can publish a study in collaboration. But collaboration is very important and violating the subject of another field without collaboration is a deontological problem.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103047
dc.identifier.issn2049-0801
dc.identifier.pmid34815861en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119080099en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103047
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100307
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000726982400012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medicine and Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHydatid diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPreoperative assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPostoperative managementen_US
dc.subjectFollow upen_US
dc.subjectSurgeon's responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiologist's responsibilityen_US
dc.titleRecommendations for the ethical guidelines for publication of scientific studies: The responsibilities of editors, reviewers and the authorsen_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu