A comparison of the success of intubation using C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscopes during double lumen tube insertion in one-lung ventilation: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErtürk, Kasım
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Ahmet Selim
dc.contributor.authorAkbaş, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorKaraaslan, Erol
dc.contributor.authorDurmuş, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:42:44Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:42:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the effects of C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscopes (VLs) during double lumen tube (DLT) insertion in one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients who underwent chest surgery in terms of intubation durations, hemodynamic responses, and intubation-induced complications. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients aged 18?65 who were scheduled for OLV were included in this study. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: a Storz C-MAC D-Blade VL group (C-MAC group, n = 25) and a McGrath MAC X3 Blade VL group (McGrath group, n = 25). The results of a preoperative airway assessment, a number of intubation attempts and incidence of success at the first attempt, glottic view times, intubation times, Cormack?Lehane scores, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores, ease of intubation, comorbidities, hemodynamic responses, and intubation-related adverse events were recorded. Results: The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of both groups were similar. The intubation characteristics of both groups were similar in terms of Cormack?Lehane scores, thyromental and intergingival distances, and POGO scores. In the C-MAC group, the glottic view times (p = 0.001) and intubation times (p = 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the McGrath group. As shown by ease of intubation scores, ease of intubation in the C-MAC group was significantly better than that in the McGrath group (p = 0.001). All the patients in the C-MAC group were intubated at the first attempt, without a statistically significant difference. The two groups were similar with respect to intubation-related complications and hemodynamic responses (mean arterial pressure and heart rate). Conclusion: We conclude that the C-MAC D-Blade VL is more beneficial for airway management due to shorter glottic view and intubation times, high success rates at the first attempt, and ease of intubation in patients intubated with a DLT in OLV.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.12.327
dc.identifier.endpage140en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage134en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1226132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.12.327
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1226132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/88640
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the success of intubation using C-MAC D-Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscopes during double lumen tube insertion in one-lung ventilation: A prospective, randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu