A comparison of continuous interscalene block versus general anesthesia alone on the functional outcomes of the patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGurger, Murat/0000-0002-7510-7203
dc.authorwosidGurger, Murat/V-8633-2018
dc.contributor.authorGurger, Murat
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Ayse Belin
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:46:01Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:46:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeThe aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the effects of general anesthesia to the combination of general anesthesia and continuous interscalene block on postoperative pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.MethodsThis study included a total of 85 patients aged 45-74 years, who were scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. One group consists of patients who underwent only general anesthesia (GA, N=43), and the other group consists of patients who underwent a combination of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block and general anesthesia (CISB+GA, N=42). Pain levels of the patients were evaluated postoperatively by a visual analog scale. Shoulder function was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Constant score.ResultsPatients in the CISB+GA group had lower postoperative visual analog scores and less additional analgesic needs during the early postoperative period than those in the GA group. Constant scores of the patients in the CISB+GA group at postoperative week 6 were higher than those in the GA group. Evaluation of the functional outcomes at 6 months postoperatively showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionAlthough CISB significantly improved postoperative pain control and early (in the first 6 weeks) functional outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there was no significant difference between the CISB group and CISB+GA group at 6 months.Level of evidenceLevel II, Randomized Controlled Trial, Treatment Study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00590-019-02482-8
dc.identifier.endpage1666en_US
dc.identifier.issn1633-8065
dc.identifier.issn1432-1068
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31243560en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068116970en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1659en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02482-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98847
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000729754800008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringernatureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInterscalene blocken_US
dc.subjectShoulder arthroscopyen_US
dc.subjectRotator cuffen_US
dc.subjectFunctional outcomesen_US
dc.titleA comparison of continuous interscalene block versus general anesthesia alone on the functional outcomes of the patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu