Evaluation of the Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria in Comparison with the RAPIDEC CARBA NP
dc.authorid | OTLU, BARIS/0000-0002-6220-0521 | |
dc.authorid | SANDALLI, Cemal/0000-0002-1298-3687 | |
dc.authorid | Comert, Fusun/0000-0003-0161-6897 | |
dc.authorid | aktas, elif/0000-0003-3087-5425 | |
dc.authorid | COPUR CICEK, AYSEGUL/0000-0002-3673-9670 | |
dc.authorwosid | SANDALLI, Cemal/ABG-1089-2021 | |
dc.authorwosid | OTLU, BARIS/ABI-5532-2020 | |
dc.authorwosid | ÇİÇEK, Ayşegül ÇOPUR/AAM-6146-2021 | |
dc.authorwosid | kulah, canan/M-7058-2019 | |
dc.authorwosid | aktas, elif/ACL-9792-2022 | |
dc.authorwosid | Bulut, Emin/AAY-8628-2021 | |
dc.contributor.author | Aktas, Elif | |
dc.contributor.author | Malkocoglu, Gulsah | |
dc.contributor.author | Otlu, Baris | |
dc.contributor.author | Cicek, Aysegul Copur | |
dc.contributor.author | Kulah, Canan | |
dc.contributor.author | Comert, Fusun | |
dc.contributor.author | Sandalli, Cemal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-04T20:43:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-04T20:43:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Timely detection of carbapenemases by both phenotypic and genotypic methods is essential for developing strategies to control the spread of infections by carbapenem-resistant isolates and related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of a commercial kit, the RAPIDEC (R) CARBA NP, and an in-house technique, the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), against a panel of 136 carbapenemase and noncarbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. RAPIDEC CARBA NP displayed 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas the sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 100% for the CIM test, respectively. A slight modification of the CIM test, a prolonged incubation time of 4 hours instead of two, increased the sensitivity of the test to 90% by diminishing false negativity particularly for A. baumannii. In conclusion, both tests possess a high performance and are practical for the detection of carbapenemases. Although RAPIDEC CARBA NP is a more rapid and reliable method, the CIM test may represent a useful tool for microbiology laboratories due to its simplicity and availability at any laboratory with low cost. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by internal funding of Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital (decision date: July 12, 2015). | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/mdr.2016.0092 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | + | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1076-6294 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1931-8448 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27575912 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85020193946 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 457 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0092 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/97842 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000402567800007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Microbial Drug Resistance | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | CIM | en_US |
dc.subject | CARBA NP | en_US |
dc.subject | carbapenemase | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of the Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria in Comparison with the RAPIDEC CARBA NP | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |