Outcomes of bone anchored in situ vaginal wall sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and literature review

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57225711977
dc.authorscopusid6503963393
dc.authorscopusid7004675268
dc.authorscopusid7801381155
dc.authorscopusid6602510375
dc.contributor.authorKiliç S.
dc.contributor.authorUtku V.
dc.contributor.authorErgin H.
dc.contributor.authorIpek D.
dc.contributor.authorGönenç F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:01:03Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of in situ vaginal wall sling operation combined with Vesica bone anchors that was performed for the treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: Postoperative outcomes of 51 women who underwent this modified sling procedure between 1996 and 1999 were compared with the results in the literature in terms of the efficacy and safety. Results: Mean age was 48.6 (range 29-68). Eight patients had mixed (stress+urge) incontinence preoperatively. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 36 (mean 23.7) months. The sling operation was the single procedure in 43 (84.3%) patients while cystocele repair was combined with sling procedure in 8. Incontinence was cured in 47 (92.1%) patients. Procedure failed in 4 (7.9%) patients. Two of these achieved dryness following re-operation with same technique. Mean suprapubic pain score at postoperative day 1 according to visual analogous scale scored between 0 and 10 was 3.86±1.18. Rates of the de novo detrusor instability and temporary urinary retention, and mean catheterization time were 27.4%, 5.9%, and 3 days, respectively. No patient remained in permanent retention or required intermittent catheterization. Intraoperative bladder perforation, postoperative suprapubic abscess, and suprapubic wound infection were encountered in 3, 1, and 3 patients, respectively. Osteitis pubis, osteomyelitis, and urethral erosion were experienced in no patients. Conclusions: At relatively short follow-up period, a satisfactory success and low complication rates were obtained with in situ vaginal wall sling in the present series. This operation technique is an easy applicable method and allows concomitant vaginal procedures.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-5804
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-6444221152en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage320en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91227
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Uroloji Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone anchoren_US
dc.subjectFemale stress urinary incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectSurgical treatmenten_US
dc.titleOutcomes of bone anchored in situ vaginal wall sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and literature reviewen_US
dc.title.alternativeKadinlarda stres tipi idrar kaçirmanin teda visinde kemik ç apalama ile in situ vajinal duvar asmanin sonuçlari ve literatür taramasien_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu