Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: Round window and cochleostomy approaches

dc.authoridKanlikama, Muzaffer/0000-0002-3537-7778
dc.authoridBaglam, Tekin/0000-0001-5056-6852
dc.authoriddurucu, cengiz/0000-0001-7607-6421
dc.authoridBaysal, Elif/0000-0001-9414-9401
dc.authorwosidKanlikama, Muzaffer/AAG-8311-2020
dc.authorwosidbaysal, elif/AAH-6406-2019
dc.authorwosidBaglam, Tekin/KHU-4616-2024
dc.authorwosiddurucu, cengiz/HNR-2511-2023
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorAud, Murat Deniz
dc.contributor.authorBaglam, Tekin
dc.contributor.authorDurucu, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Elif
dc.contributor.authorKanlikama, Muzaffer
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:35:32Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:35:32Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To study the best electrically stimulation in cochlear implant surgery with round window (RW) and Promontory cochleostomy approaches with electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds (ESRT) intraoperatively. Methods: Thirty-nine children underwent CI surgery were included for this study. The surgical procedures consisted of RW and Promontory cochleostomy. ESRT for each 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th electrodes (E) were determined. Statistical evaluation was done for the comparison of the thresholds and duration times for both groups. Results: The duration times of ESRT for E1, E3, E6 and E12 electrodes was shorter in RW group compared with the Promontory group (p < 0.05). The statistical evaluation of ESRT measurements of E1, E3, E6 found p < 0.001 and E12 electrode p < 0.05 in RW group. ESRT measurements were recorded at lower threshold in the RW group compared with the Promontory group. Conclusion: The duration of electrically stimulation thresholds were shorter in RW group. ESRT measurements were recorded at lower threshold in the RW group compared with the Promontory group. RW insertion offers best electrically stimulation relative to electrode insertion via a promontory cochleostomy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.06.002
dc.identifier.endpage1126en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21737149en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80051879877en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1123en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.06.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95412
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000295116400014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCochlear implantationen_US
dc.subjectRound windowen_US
dc.subjectPromontoryen_US
dc.subjectCochleostomyen_US
dc.subjectStimulationen_US
dc.titleIntraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: Round window and cochleostomy approachesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar