Natural orifice specimen extraction versus transabdominal extraction in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGunes, Orgun/0000-0002-0576-6086
dc.authoridBag, Yusuf Murat/0000-0002-0159-9356
dc.authoridSumer, Fatih/0000-0002-0557-1369
dc.authorwosidGundogan, Ersin/AFE-0184-2022
dc.authorwosidGunes, Orgun/GLN-4395-2022
dc.authorwosidBag, Yusuf Murat/ABD-2949-2021
dc.authorwosidSumer, Fatih/F-8042-2017
dc.contributor.authorGundogan, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorGokler, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Orgun
dc.contributor.authorBag, Murat
dc.contributor.authorSumer, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:50:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:50:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for colorectal resections, which further enhance the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, are being used increasingly more often. In this study, we aimed to compare NOSE and transabdominal specimen extraction methods in cases of totally laparoscopic right colon resections. Methods: Data of 52 patients who underwent laparoscopic right colon surgery between 2013 and 2019 were included in the study. Transabdominal specimen removal was done in 35 patients, while 17 patients underwent NOSE. Demographic data, operative findings, pathological results, and follow-up data were compared. Results: Female (94% vs. 28%, p = 0.0001), co-morbid (76% vs. 40%, p = 0.01), and previous abdominal surgery history (75% vs. 23%, p = 0.001) were higher in the NOSE group. All the other pre-operative features of the groups were comparable. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and complication rates were similar in both groups. Post-operative visual analog scale (2.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 4.5 +/- 2.4, p = 0.001) and cosmetic scores were better in the NOSE group (10 vs. 7, p= 0.0001). Oncologic results were similar after a mean follow-up of 27.4 +/- 20.5 (1-77) months. Conclusion: The NOSE method following laparoscopic right colon resection was a more advantageous method in terms of cosmetics and postoperative pain than transabdominal specimen extraction.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.24875/CIRU.20000321
dc.identifier.endpage333en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-7411
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34037617en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106950298en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage326en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.20000321
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99962
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000658537600008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMexican Acad Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCirugia Y Cirujanosen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectNatural orifice specimen extractionen_US
dc.subjectColon canceren_US
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgeryen_US
dc.subjectNatural orifice surgeryen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic colorectalen_US
dc.titleNatural orifice specimen extraction versus transabdominal extraction in laparoscopic right hemicolectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu