Energy expenditure, oxygen consumption, and heart rate while exercising on seven different indoor cardio machines at maximum and self-selected submaximal intensity

dc.authoridYagin, Fatma Hilal/0000-0002-9848-7958
dc.authoridPrieto-González, Pablo/0000-0002-0668-4031
dc.authorwosidYagin, Fatma Hilal/ABI-8066-2020
dc.authorwosidPrieto-González, Pablo/T-9113-2018
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-Gonzalez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorYagin, Fatma Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:55:06Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:55:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective One of the main objectives of practicing indoor cardiovascular exercise is to maximize caloric expenditure. This study aimed to compare energy expenditure (EE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and heart rate (HR) recorded in middle-aged adults while exercising on seven different indoor cardiovascular machines at self-selected maximal and submaximal intensity.Method Thirty recreational-active adult males (Age: 41.69 +/- 4.64) performed 12-min bouts at RPE (Rate of perceived exertion) 17 and maximum intensity (MAX INT) on the following indoor cardio machines: Recumbent bike (r_BIKE), upright bike (u-BIKE), spin bike (s-BIKE), rowing machine (ROW), elliptical trainer (ELLIP), stair climber (STAIR), and treadmill (TMILL). Heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured during exercise, whereas EE (energy expenditure) was calculated indirectly.Results Overall, TMILL induced the highest levels of EE, VO2, and HR, followed by STAIR, ELLIP, s_BIKE, u_BIKE, ROW, and r_BIKE. RPE was reliable across exercise modalities (r_BIKE, u-BIKE, s-BIKE, ROW, ELLIP, STAIR, and TMILL) and intensities (RPE 17 and MAX INT) for EE, HR, and VO2 measurements.Conclusion To maximize EE while performing indoor cardiovascular exercise for recreational active middle-aged male participants, the TMILL is the best option, followed by the STAIR and the ELLIP. The least recommended options are, respectively, s_BIKE, u_BIKE, ROW, and r_BIKE. Beyond caloric expenditure considerations, promoting exercises that participants genuinely enjoy can enhance adherence, fostering sustained health benefits. Furthermore, RPE is a reliable tool for assessing EE, VO2, and HR across different exercise modalities and intensities.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPrince Sultan Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author would like to thank Prince Sultan University for their support.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fspor.2024.1313886
dc.identifier.issn2624-9367
dc.identifier.pmid38390229en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85185444722en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1313886
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101827
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001169805400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Saen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Sports and Active Livingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRate of Perceived Exertionen_US
dc.subjectenergy expenditureen_US
dc.subjectheart rateen_US
dc.subjectoxygen consumptionen_US
dc.subjectindoor cardio machinesen_US
dc.titleEnergy expenditure, oxygen consumption, and heart rate while exercising on seven different indoor cardio machines at maximum and self-selected submaximal intensityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar