Comparison of percutaneous pinning with Kirschner wires and internal fixation with anatomical proximal humeral plates for proximal humeral fractures

dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Celal
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Baran
dc.contributor.authorSipahioglu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorErgun, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAltay, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorIsikan, Erdem Ugur
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T14:23:58Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T14:23:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The treatment of proximal humeral fractures is a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to compare clinically and radiologically the results of two surgical treatment methods for proximal humeral fractures. Material and Methods: Between January 2010 and January 2016, 32 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of displaced proximal humeral fracture who underwent surgical treatment were evaluated retrospectively. The fractures were classified as two-, three-, and four-part fractures according to the Neer system. Sixteen patients were treated with closed-reduction percutaneous pinning and 16 patients were treated with open-reduction internal fixation with proximal humerus anatomical plates. The results were compared clinically using the Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score (CS) and radiologically with direct roentgenograms. Results: The CSs of the Kirschner wire (K-wire) and plate groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.696). The mean CS values were 76.56 ± 19.11 for the K-wire group and 73.56 ± 15.91 for the plate group. No case of avascular necrosis (AVN) and three cases of partial loss of reduction occurred in the K-wire group. In the plate group, two cases of AVN and no case of loss of reduction occurred. All fractures in both groups healed, with no need for revision surgery in either group. Conclusion: The clinical and radiological results of the plate and K-wire groups were similar. Percutaneous fixation has the advantage of minimal invasiveness, which lowers the rate of complications. Closed reduction with K-wire application is a good alternative, especially for two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humeral surgical neck.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBozkurt, C., Sarikaya, B., Sipahioglu, S., Ergun, M., Akif Altay, M., & Erdem Isikan, U. (2021). Comparison of percutaneous pinning with Kirschner wires and internal fixation with anatomical proximal humeral plates for proximal humeral fractures . Annals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2018.07.146 2018;25(4)673-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/53860
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of percutaneous pinning with Kirschner wires and internal fixation with anatomical proximal humeral plates for proximal humeral fracturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
673-677.pdf
Boyut:
438.26 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: