Flexural toughness of sustainable ECC with high-volume substitution of cement and silica sand

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridNehdi, Moncef/0000-0002-2561-993X
dc.authoridTurk, Kazim/0000-0002-6314-9465;
dc.authorwosidNehdi, Moncef/P-3725-2019
dc.authorwosidTurk, Kazim/AAB-7513-2019
dc.authorwosidNehdi, Moncef L./D-3480-2013
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Kazim
dc.contributor.authorNehdi, Moncef L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the effects of high-content fly ash and limestone filler partial replacement for portland cement and silica sand, respectively on the flexural toughness parameters of engineered cementitious composites (ECC). Various groups of mixtures having variable fly ash/portland cement ratio and different levels of limestone filler were prepared. ASTM C1609, JSCE-SF4 and the Post-Crack Strength method were employed to appraise the flexural toughness parameters of the ECC mixtures at 3, 28 and 90-d. The results show that according to ASTM C1609, JSCE-SF4 and the Post-Crack Strength method, limestone filler did not significantly affect the flexural toughness, while the flexural toughness of ECC beams decreased when the fly ash content increased. Considering deflection capacity, specimens made with a FA/OPC ratio of 1.2 without limestone filler achieved higher ductility at all curing ages. Owing to its superior crack resistance and toughness compared to normal concrete, ECC with high fly ash content and limestone filler could be a sustainable alternative construction material in diverse civil engineering applications. ECC with enhanced ductility compared to normal concrete could offer increased crack resistance, durability and better resilience. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkey's Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK) through the International PDF Scholarship Program [TUBITAK-BIDEB-2219, 2012-2]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received financial support from Turkey's Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK), Grant Number: TUBITAK-BIDEB-2219, through the (2012-2) International PDF Scholarship Program.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121438
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618
dc.identifier.issn1879-0526
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095567469en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121438
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99615
dc.identifier.volume270en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000608034600061en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofConstruction and Building Materialsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEngineered cementitious compositeen_US
dc.subjectToughnessen_US
dc.subjectDuctilityen_US
dc.subjectModulus of ruptureen_US
dc.subjectLimestone powderen_US
dc.subjectSilica sanden_US
dc.subjectFly ashen_US
dc.titleFlexural toughness of sustainable ECC with high-volume substitution of cement and silica sanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu