Comparison of nutritional risk status assessment tools in predicting 30-day survival in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients

dc.authoridKasapoglu, Umut Sabri/0000-0003-2869-9872
dc.authorwosidOZER, Ayse B/R-8915-2018
dc.authorwosidKasapoglu, Umut Sabri/F-1786-2019
dc.contributor.authorKasapoglu, Umut Sabri
dc.contributor.authorGok, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorDelen, Leman Acun
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Ayse Belin
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:52:14Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:52:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Few clinical studies have addressed nutritional risk assessment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVES: Assess the nutritional risk status of the critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU, and compare the nutritional risk screening tools. DESIGN: Medical record review SETTINGS: Tertiary critical care unit PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included adult (age >18 years) PCR-confirmed critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia cases admitted to the ICU between August 2020 and September 2021. Scoring systems were used to assess COVID-19 severity and nutritional status (mNUTRIC: modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill, NRS2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). The 30-day mortality prediction performance of nutritional scores and survival comparisons between clinical and demographic factors were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compare the nutrition risk tools SAMPLE SIZE: 281 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.3 (13.3) years; 143 (50.8%) were 65 years and older. RESULTS: The mean mNUTRIC score of the cases was 3.81 (1.66) and the mean NRS-2002 score was 3.21 (0.84.), and 101 (35.9%) were at high risk of malnutrition according to the mNUTRIC score and 229 (81.4%) according to the NRS 2002 score. In cases at high risk of malnutrition by the mNUTRIC score there was a greater need for invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy (P<.001 for all comparisons). The mNUTRIC score was superior to the NRS-2002 score in estimating 30-day mortality. In patients who died within 30 days, the mNUTRIC score and NRS-2002 score on the day of hospitalization were significantly higher (P<.001), and the proportion of patients with NRS2002 score >= 3 and mNUTRIC score >= 5 was significantly higher in the non-surviving group (P<.001). In addition, patients with a high risk of malnutrition had a shorter survival time. The mNUTRIC score was an independent and important prognostic factor for 30-day mortality, and patients with an mNUTRIC score >= 5 had a 6.26-fold risk for 30-day mortality in the multivariate Cox regression. CONCLUSION: One third of critical COVID-19 pneumonia cases hospitalized in the ICU due to acute respiratory failure have a high risk of malnutrition, and a high mNUTRIC score is associated with increased mortality. LIMITATIONS: Single center retrospective study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5144/0256-4947.2022.236
dc.identifier.endpage245en_US
dc.identifier.issn0256-4947
dc.identifier.issn1319-9226
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35933605en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135598058en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage236en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100828
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000852836000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherK Faisal Spec Hosp Res Centreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Saudi Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectScoreen_US
dc.titleComparison of nutritional risk status assessment tools in predicting 30-day survival in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar