Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridErsoz, Mustafa/0000-0002-9409-9157
dc.authorwosidErsoz, Mustafa/A-3007-2019
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Firat
dc.contributor.authorErsoz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Seyit Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorHatunoglu, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:41:40Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with direct and different indirect bonding techniques and adhesives using micro-computed tomography. A total of 30 human maxillary premolars were randomly separated into five groups with six teeth in each group. In group I, teeth were bonded directly with Transbond XT (3M Unitek). In group II, group III, group IV, and group V, teeth were bonded through an indirect technique with Custom I.Q. (Reliance Orthodontic Products), Sondhi Rapid-Set (3M Unitek), RMbond (RMO), and Transbond IDB (3M Unitek), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions. Micro-CT system model 1172 of Skyscan (Kontich, Belgium) was used to scan all samples. NRecon (Skyscan) version 1.6, CT-Analyser V.1.11 (Skyscan), and TView (SkyScan, Bvba) software programs were used for microleakage evaluation. Microleakage values between the test groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for within-group comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. According to the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test, there were no significant differences among the tested groups, with regard to volume and percentage (microleakage/region of interest x 100) of microleakage values (P < 0.05). The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that coronal microleakage volume and percentage values significantly differed for RMbond and Transbond IDB groups. In the study, only ceramic brackets were used and microleakage into mini gaps did not show up on the micro-CT image because 50% silver nitrate solution could not penetrate into mini gaps which are smaller than silver nitrate particles. Use of direct and indirect bonding techniques with different adhesives did not significantly affect the amount of microleakage.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjv023
dc.identifier.endpage169en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25855655en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963974251en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage163en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97277
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374414300007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMetal Bracketsen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectMarginal Leakageen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectLighten_US
dc.subjectRestorationsen_US
dc.subjectPlacementen_US
dc.subjectCompositeen_US
dc.subjectSystemsen_US
dc.subjectBovineen_US
dc.titleMicro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu