Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength
| dc.contributor.author | Demirci, Fatih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tekin, S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-08T13:49:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-08T13:49:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract: Aim: In this in vitro study, the effect of two adhesive systems applied to surfaces of different polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a composite resin was compared. Methodology: Eighty PEEK specimens were divided into four groups (n=20): Unfilled PEEK (UF), carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR), glassfiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR), and ceramic-reinforced PEEK (CR). Each group was further divided into two subgroups (n=10): Visio.link (VL) and Single Bond Universal (SB). The specimens with 8-mm diameter and 5-mm thickness were prepared. SBS was examined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. Surface properties were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The surface properties of the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Effect of different PEEK and adhesive systems on SBS was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). SBS values for CFR-VL and UF-VL groups were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and UF-SB groups. SBS values for the GFR-VL group were statistically more significant than that for the UF-VL group. SBS values for the CF-SB group were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and CFR-SB groups. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification, and adhesive and mixed failure modes were observed. Conclusion: PEEK composites with different contents and properties can be used in fixed prosthetic restorations. However, additional experimental and clinical studies are required to investigate different PEEK frameworks and composite veneers. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | DEMİRCİ F,TEKİN S (2021). Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research, 11(2), 54 - 61. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 61 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2146-1767 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 54 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.trdizinid | 482256 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/46898 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/482256 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en_US |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Dental Research | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
