Our clinical results in the management of proximal humeral fractures

dc.contributor.authorKey, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Şükrü
dc.contributor.authorEmeli, Adem
dc.contributor.authorGürger, Murat
dc.contributor.authorSevimli, Reşit
dc.contributor.authorÖnce, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T07:06:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T07:06:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional results of patients treated with different methods in our clinic for proximal humerus fracture. Material and Methods: A total of 106 patients with a diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture, who were scheduled for treatment, received management and followed up periodically after discharge were included. Patient files, X-RAY radiographs in the PACS system, surgical notes and outpatient epicrisis were used. Functional results were evaluated according to Constant shoulder score at the last visit. Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.6 years (17-94). The mean follow-up period was 11.3 months (6-40 months). 55 (51.9%) had Type II, 35 (33%) had Type III and 16 (15.1%) had Type IV proximal end humeral fractures. As a result of the evaluation performed at the last follow-up of the patients, Constant-Murley’s total score was 64.50 out of 100 (31-88). Score distribution according to Neer classification of patients; A Constant-Murley score median with a Neer Type II fracture was 74.00 (36-88), a Constant-Murley Score median with a Neer Type III fracture was 61.00 (31-78), and a Constant-Murley score median with a Neer Type IV fracture was 44.50 (33-70). Conclusion: When the fracture type and functional outcome of the patients were compared, functional outcome decreased as the fracture type increased. Young patients had better functional results than older patients.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKEY S,DEMİR Ş,EMELİ A,GÜRGER M,SEVİMLİ R,ÖNCE G (2020). Our clinical results in the management of proximal humeral fractures. Annals of Medical Research, 27(1), 63 - 68. Doi: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.816en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.816en_US
dc.identifier.endpage68en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid362825en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.816
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/19627
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/362825
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleOur clinical results in the management of proximal humeral fracturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
248.12 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Doyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: