Uncertainty-Based Analysis for Agreement of Tensile-Strength Measurement Procedures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÜNVER, BAHTİYAR/0000-0003-3366-800X
dc.authoridTutmez, Bulent/0000-0002-2618-3285
dc.authorwosidÜNVER, BAHTİYAR/G-5922-2013
dc.authorwosidTutmez, Bulent/ABG-8630-2020
dc.contributor.authorTutmez, B.
dc.contributor.authorUnver, B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:43:56Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractRocks fail because of compression, shear, tensile and/or a combination of these stresses. Rocks are more vulnerable to tensile stresses as they can stably accommodate only a fraction of compressive stresses in tensional loading. Therefore, reliable determination of tensile strength of rocks is important. Tensile strength of rocks that can be determined by both direct and indirect tensile testing methods have great importance in rock mechanics. Although these methods have different procedures and quite a change in results, an agreement between the methods is necessary. In addition, properly appraising the data provided by direct and indirect measurements has critical importance for applying the knowledge thereby acquired. From this point, based on the conventional measurement uncertainty framework, two weighting methods are suggested to combine the tensile strength methods. Thus, an uncertainty-based agreement between the direct and indirect tensile-strength measurements has been made. The results showed that the weighted uncertainties of the proposed methods are lower than the best single measurement uncertainties. In addition, the weighted averages and corresponding uncertainties provide additional information and unique outcomes for the users. A reliable correlation between indirect and direct tensile-strength results is certainly useful for assessing tensile strength of rocks.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1520/GTJ20160217
dc.identifier.issn0149-6115
dc.identifier.issn1945-7545
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027447252en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160217
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97930
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000405477000014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmer Soc Testing Materialsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeotechnical Testing Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecttensile strengthen_US
dc.subjectmeasurement uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectstandard averagingen_US
dc.subjectmaximum likelihood criterionen_US
dc.titleUncertainty-Based Analysis for Agreement of Tensile-Strength Measurement Proceduresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu