Comparison of the effects of direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic oral endotracheal intubation on the intraocular pressures of non-ophthalmic patients: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Sait
dc.contributor.authorAkbaş, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Ahmet Selim
dc.contributor.authorKaraaslan, Erol
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Nihat
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Kayhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:42:40Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:42:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Aim: In this prospective, randomised, clinical study; we aimed to compare the effects of endotracheal intubation (ETI) via direct laryngoscope (DLS) and fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic data of non-ophthalmic patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four adult patients undergoing non-ophthalmic surgeries performed in the supine position under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were included into the study. The patients were randomly and prospectively divided into 2 groups: Group DLS (n=27) and Group FOB (n=27). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), Heart rate (HR), IOP were measured at before induction (basal), post-induction and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th minutes of intubation. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in distribution of patient characteristics. Duration of intubation was significantly longer in Group FOB (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in MAP and HR when groups compared each other. Statistically significant increase was found in IOP at 1st minute of intubation in Group DLS when compared with Group FOB (p<0.001). No significant difference was found in terms of IOP in other time periods. Conclusion: We thought that endotracheal intubation by FOB could be more useful with respect to endotracheal intubation by DLS in patients with high IOP due to significantly less rise caused in IOP when performed by experienced anesthesiologists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.12.669
dc.identifier.endpage721en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage717en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1119450en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.12.669
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1119450
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/88571
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic oral endotracheal intubation on the intraocular pressures of non-ophthalmic patients: A prospective, randomised, clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu