Ethics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspective

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYıldız, Erman/0000-0002-6544-4847
dc.authorwosidYıldız, Erman/L-6901-2019
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Erman
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:44:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:44:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine the current state of knowledge on nursing and ethics and to assess the knowledge and experience based on the evidence in this regard. Background: Although ethics is at the center of the nursing profession and the ethical issues affecting nurses are given much importance, few studies have focused on professional ethics in nursing. In this respect, ethics has become a concept that contains controversial and ambiguous situations. Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide, a basic search algorithm, was taken. Data sources: Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, and ULAKBIM from 2012 to 2016. Review methods: Following a systematic search strategy, all papers were assessed in relation to inclusion criteria and type of study. When sufficient information was not available in the title and summary of the works, the necessary data were evaluated in full texts. Results: This review was completed with 27 articles meeting the research criteria. The evaluation identified six themes: (1) ethics and nursing, (2) ethical difficulties/ethical dilemmas and nursing, (3) ethical competence and nursing, (4) professional ethics and nursing, (5) ethics, education, and nursing, and (6) ethics in health research. Conclusion: As a result of the review, a synthesis of high evidence-level research relating to nursing ethics was obtained. The emphasis was on the importance of further research and education so that the ethical aspects of nursing can be better understood throughout the studies. Nursing researchers' level of evidence on ethics and their orientation to high research design will shed light on uncertain and controversial aspects of the subject. Ethical consideration: Since this was a systematic review, no ethical approval was required. There is no conflict of interest in this literature review.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0969733017734412
dc.identifier.endpage1148en_US
dc.identifier.issn0969-7330
dc.identifier.issn1477-0989
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29166840en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85041314540en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1128en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017734412
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98140
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000471341500016en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Ethicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCodes of ethicsen_US
dc.subjectempirical approachesen_US
dc.subjectethics educationen_US
dc.subjectethics of careen_US
dc.subjectcare ethicsen_US
dc.subjectliterature reviewen_US
dc.subjectmoral distressen_US
dc.subjectmoral sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectprofessional ethicsen_US
dc.subjecttheoryen_US
dc.subjectphilosophical perspectivesen_US
dc.subjectnursing and nursing careen_US
dc.titleEthics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspectiveen_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu