Does osseointegration occur around nonprimary stabilized titanium implants? A histomorphometric analysis

dc.authoridToy, Vesile Elif/0000-0001-5183-6295
dc.authorwosidToy, Vesile Elif/ABH-9210-2020
dc.contributor.authorToy, V. E.
dc.contributor.authorSabanci, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorDundar, S.
dc.contributor.authorBozoglan, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:54:56Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:54:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim The aim of this study was to analyze the levels of bone implant contact (BIC) and bone area between the threads (BABT) of primary and nonprimary stabilized titanium implants histologically in rats. Materials and methods Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were categorized as two groups: primary (PS) and nonprimary stabilization (NPS) groups. Totally, 14 titanium implants with machined surfaces were integrated into the tibial bones of the rats with and without primary stabilization in the PS and NPS groups, respectively. After 12 weeks of healing, the rats were sacrificed, block sections were acquired for histological analysis. Results The BIC ratios (%) in the PS and NPS groups were 53.23 +/- 5.65% and 40.79 +/- 5.59%, respectively and was significantly higher in the PS group as compared with that in the NPS group (P<0.05). The mean BABT ratios (%) in the PS and NPS groups were 55.71 +/- 7.32% and 37.14 +/- 2.67% respectively. The BABT ratio (%) was significantly higher in the PS group than in the NPS group (P<0.05). Conclusion The results suggest that osseointegration may occur despite the absence of primary stability at the end of a 12-week healing period but primary stabilization at the time of installation appears to be critical in achieving maximum BIC and BABT.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23805/JO.2023.584
dc.identifier.endpage242en_US
dc.identifier.issn2036-413X
dc.identifier.issn2036-4121
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179115386en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage238en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2023.584
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101709
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001157385100004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAriesdue Srlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Osseointegrationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental implanten_US
dc.subjectHistomorphometric analysisen_US
dc.subjectOsseointegrationen_US
dc.subjectPrimary stabilizationen_US
dc.titleDoes osseointegration occur around nonprimary stabilized titanium implants? A histomorphometric analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar