Comparison of a new flap design with the routinely used triangular flap design in third molar surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYolcu, Ümit/0000-0001-7312-2867
dc.authorwosidAcar, Ahmet Hüseyin/KWT-7138-2024
dc.authorwosidYolcu, Ümit/ABH-6916-2020
dc.contributor.authorYolcu, U.
dc.contributor.authorAcar, A. H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:41:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to introduce a new flap design in the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars a lingually based triangular flap and to compare this flap design with the routinely used triangular flap. This randomized, prospective, split-mouth study involved 22 patients with impacted bilateral mandibular third molars that were symmetrically positioned, mesially angulated, and retained in bone. The impacted teeth were removed in two sessions, using two different flap designs: the new alternative flap and the traditional triangular flap. Postoperative complications (pain, swelling, trismus, alveolar osteitis, and wound dehiscence) were recorded on days 2, 7, 14, and 21. The data obtained were analysed using the chi(2) test, the Mann Whitney U-test, and Pearson's correlation. In terms of the severity of postoperative facial swelling and trismus, there were no statistically significant differences between the flap designs (P > 0.05). The alternative flap exhibited higher pain scores at 12 h post-surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, the alternative flap group exhibited less wound dehiscence, although this was not statistically significant. Moreover, all wound dehiscence in this group occurred on sound bone. In conclusion, these results show that this new flap design is preferable to the routinely used flap for impacted third molar surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.007
dc.identifier.endpage1397en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26254819en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84944276720en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97011
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000363826000011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectimpacted third molaren_US
dc.subjecttriangular flapen_US
dc.subjectprimary wound healingen_US
dc.titleComparison of a new flap design with the routinely used triangular flap design in third molar surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu