Phenolic compounds, bioactive content and antioxidant capacity of the fruits of mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm in Turkey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGündoğdu, Muttalip/0000-0002-9375-7365
dc.authoridGECER, MUSTAFA KENAN/0000-0003-1959-9909
dc.authoridGECER, MUSTAFA KENAN/0000-0003-1959-9909
dc.authoridCANAN, IHSAN/0000-0002-7694-9859
dc.authorwosidGündoğdu, Muttalip/HNJ-2899-2023
dc.authorwosidGECER, MUSTAFA KENAN/V-5873-2017
dc.authorwosidGECER, MUSTAFA KENAN/GNP-3162-2022
dc.authorwosidcanan, ihsan/AAT-7263-2021
dc.authorwosidCANAN, IHSAN/C-2689-2019
dc.contributor.authorGundogdu, Muttalip
dc.contributor.authorCanan, Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorGecer, Mustafa K.
dc.contributor.authorKan, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorErcisli, Sezai
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:44:15Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:44:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was carried out in 2014 and 2015, and aimed to determine some important biochemical and antioxidant characteristics of the fruits of mulberry (Morus spp.) cultivars and genotypes found in Malatya (Turkey). Phenolic compounds (protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, ellagic acid, rutin, quercetin, gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, o-coumaric acid, phloridzin and ferulic acid), organic acids, sugars, vitamin C and antioxidant capacity were analyzed in sampled fruits. The results showed that most of the biochemical content and antioxidant capacities of the cultivars and genotypes were significantly different from one another (p < 0.05). Among the phenolic compounds, rutin (118.23 mg 100 g(-1)), gallic acid (36.85 mg 100 g(-1)), and chlorogenic acid (92.07 mg 100 g(-1)) were determined to have the highest values for most of the fruit samples. Malic acid and citric acid were dominant among the organic acids for all the cultivars and genotypes except 44-Nrk-05. Glucose was measured as a more abundant sugar than fructose and sucrose in all samples. Antioxidant capacity, on the other hand, varied between 6.17 and 21.13 mu mol TE g(-1) among the cultivars and genotypes analyzed.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/fhort-2017-0023
dc.identifier.endpage262en_US
dc.identifier.issn0867-1761
dc.identifier.issn2083-5965
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040323189en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage251en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2017-0023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98109
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000419752500014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPolish Soc Horticultural Scien_US
dc.relation.ispartofFolia Horticulturaeen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcultivaren_US
dc.subjectgenotypeen_US
dc.subjectmulberryen_US
dc.subjectphytochemicalsen_US
dc.titlePhenolic compounds, bioactive content and antioxidant capacity of the fruits of mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu