Is kugel herniorraphy really minimally invasive?: A prospective, randomized study
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2006
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Abstract:Amaç:Kugel fıtık tamirinin minimal invaziv bir teknik olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Kugel ve Lichtenstein girişimlerinden sonra gelişen enflamatuvar yanıtları ve klinik sonuçları karşılaştırmaktı. Hastalar ve Metotlar: Tek taraflı kasık fıtığı olan 30 hasta Kugel ve Lichtenstein tamir gruplarına rastgele ayrıldılar. Cerrahi girişimden hemen önce ve girişimden sonraki 12. ve 48. saatlerde, interlökin-6 ve C-reaktif protein seviyelerini ölçmek için periferik venöz kan örnekleri alındı. Cerrahi sonrası akut ve kronik ağrı değerlendirildi. Normal aktivitelere ve işe dönüş süreleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Lichtenstein girişiminden sonra interlökin-6 düzeyleri belirgin olarak artarken Kugel fıtık tamiri, interlökin-6 düzeylerinde anlamlı olmayan bir artışa neden oldu. C-reaktif protein düzeyleri her iki grupta da belirgin olarak arttı. Kugel girişiminden sonra hastaların ağrısı daha azdı ve daha erken iyileştiler. Sonuç: Sonuçlarımız göstermektedir ki, Kugel fıtık tamiri Lichtenstein tekniği ile karşılaştırıldığında daha az enflamatuvar yanıta, daha az ameliyat sonrası ağrıya ve daha hızlı iyileşmeye neden olmaktadır.
Abstract:Background: Kugel herniorraphy had been advocated as a minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to compare inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes after Kugel and Lichtenstein procedures. Patients and methods: Thirty patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into Kugel and Lichtenstein repair groups. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected, to measure the levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, just prior to surgery and then 12 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative acute and chronic pains were evaluated. Time to return normal activities and work was recorded. Results: Interleukin-6 levels significantly increased after Lichtenstein procedure.C-reactive protein levels were significantly increased in both groups. Patients had less postoperative pain and they recovered earlier after the Kugel procedure. Conclusions:In conclusion our data show that Kugel herniorraphy causes less inflammatory response, less postoperative acute pain and rapid recovery compared with Lichtenstein technique.
Abstract:Background: Kugel herniorraphy had been advocated as a minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to compare inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes after Kugel and Lichtenstein procedures. Patients and methods: Thirty patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into Kugel and Lichtenstein repair groups. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected, to measure the levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, just prior to surgery and then 12 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative acute and chronic pains were evaluated. Time to return normal activities and work was recorded. Results: Interleukin-6 levels significantly increased after Lichtenstein procedure.C-reactive protein levels were significantly increased in both groups. Patients had less postoperative pain and they recovered earlier after the Kugel procedure. Conclusions:In conclusion our data show that Kugel herniorraphy causes less inflammatory response, less postoperative acute pain and rapid recovery compared with Lichtenstein technique.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynak
İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
Künye
KIRKIL C,AYGEN E,BÜLBÜLLER N,DOĞRU O,ÖDEKMERDAN A,GİRGİN M,SARAÇ M (2006). Is kugel herniorraphy really minimally invasive?: A prospective, randomized study. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(4), 227 - 230.
