Experience of the small size (25 mm) sorin bicarbon bileaflet prosthetic valve in patients with small mitral annuli

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridErdil, Nevzat/0000-0002-8275-840X
dc.authoridUzun, Mehmet/0000-0003-2999-489X
dc.authorwosidUzun, Mehmet/AAG-6466-2019
dc.authorwosidDemirkilic, Ufuk/AGL-1115-2022
dc.authorwosidErdil, Nevzat/K-8079-2019
dc.contributor.authorErdil, N
dc.contributor.authorCetin, L
dc.contributor.authorDemirkilic, U
dc.contributor.authorTatar, H
dc.contributor.authorUzun, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:13:33Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:13:33Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Currently, there is a tendency to use large-size prosthetic valves in mitral position in order to achieve better hemodynamic performance. We aimed to evaluate hemodynamic performance of 25 mm prosthetic valves in mitral position. Methods: Between August 1998 and May 2000, a total of 40 patients, 34 women and 6 men (mean age 42 12 years), underwent mitral valve replacement with 25 mm bileaflet mechanical valve. Preoperative functional capacity was New York Heart Association classes III and IV in 31 patients. Major indication for surgery was severe mitral stenosis in all patients. Results: Total hospital mortality was 5% (two patients). Mean follow-up period was 14.7 +/- 4.9 months (2 to 23 months). No thromboembolic event, paravalvular leak, mechanical failure, endocarditis were observed during the follow-up period. Postoperatively 92.5% of the patients were in the functional capacity of New York Heart Association class I. Postoperative echocardiographic observations have given an average pulmonary artery pressure of 29 +/- 2 mmHg, effective orifice area as 2.95 +/- 0.1 cm(2), and mean prosthetic gradient as 6.5 +/- 2.7 mmHg. Conclusion: In short- and mid-term, small-size (25 mm) Sorin mechanical mitral valves had excellent hemodynamic performance in patients with severe mitral stenosis, moderate or serious pulmonary hypertension, and small mitral annuli, whose body surface area was smaller than 1.6 m(2).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.0886-0440.2003.02065.x
dc.identifier.endpage538en_US
dc.identifier.issn0886-0440
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid14992105en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0345257049en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage532en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.0886-0440.2003.02065.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/93690
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000186842200012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Futura Publishing, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cardiac Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMaze-Iii Procedureen_US
dc.subjectHeart-Valveen_US
dc.subjectReplacementen_US
dc.subjectMulticenteren_US
dc.subjectDiseaseen_US
dc.titleExperience of the small size (25 mm) sorin bicarbon bileaflet prosthetic valve in patients with small mitral annulien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu