Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

dc.contributor.authorSarici, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorErkurt, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorKuku, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorBahçecioğlu, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorGok, Selim
dc.contributor.authorBicim, Soykan
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Emin
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T10:35:16Z
dc.date.available2022-12-16T10:35:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn hematologic malignancy patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, the optimal conditioning regimen is uncertain and comparative studies of conditioning regimens with each other are needed. In the current study, it was intended to compare the toxicity profile of two myeloablative conditioning regimens (treosulfan-fludarabine vs busulfan-cyclophosphamide) and their effects on clinical outcomes. The data of patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2015 and 2020 in Inonu University Turgut Ozal Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving treosulfan-fludarabine (treosulfan group) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (busulfan group) as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic HSCT were matched 1: 1 according to their disease and age. A total of 42 patients were included in this trial (busulfan: 21, treosulfan: 21). The mean age of the patients was 45.2±14 years, and regimen-related toxicities and clinical outcomes of both groups were similar (all p>0.05). The median follow-up time of the patients in the treosulfan regimen groups was 9 months, while it was 15 months in the busulfan regimen group (p=0.82). 54.8% of the patients (12 treosulfan, 11 busulfan) died after a median follow-up of 9.5 months. When the effects of the two conditioning regimens on were compared in 28 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, the engraftment times, acute and chronic graft versus host disease incidences, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome incidence were found to be similar in busulfan and treosulfan groups (all p>0.05). In addition, the estimated median progression-free survival (p=0.938) and overall survival (p=0.672) of the groups were similar. Treosulfan-fludarabine appears to be a conditioning regimen that can be used as an alternative to busulfan-cyclophosphamide. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the data in our study.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSARICI A, ERKURT M, KUKU İ, BAHÇECİOĞLU Ö, GÖK S, BİÇİM S, KAYA E (2021). Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Medicine Science, 10(4), 1133 - 1137. 10.5455/medscience.2021.03.083en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2021.03.083en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1137en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-0634
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1133en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid504462en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2021.03.083
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/85807
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/504462
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
document - 2022-12-16T133459.742.pdf
Boyut:
471.84 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: