Aluminum Recovery by Acid Leaching of Variously Enriched Pyrophyllite Ore: Effects of Pre-treatment Methods for Activation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAYDOĞMUŞ, Ramazan/0000-0002-8127-6775
dc.authoridErdemoglu, Murat/0000-0003-2922-7965
dc.authorwosidAYDOĞMUŞ, Ramazan/GLS-3149-2022
dc.authorwosidUYSAL, TURAN/AAM-1634-2021
dc.contributor.authorAydogmus, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorErdemoglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Turan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:54:27Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:54:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractEffects of pre-treatment methods such as calcination for thermal activation and intensive milling for mechanical activation on the aluminum (Al) recovery by acid leaching of preliminarily enriched pyrophyllite ore via attrition scrubbing and froth flotation were investigated. XRD patterns of the calcined and the intensively milled samples were compared to determine the changes during the pre-treatment processes. Hot HCl solution was used for dissolution of aluminum to determine the Al recoveries from variously enriched and variously pre-treated pyrophyllite ore samples. Specific thermal and milling energies consumed per unit amount of ore were calculated, and the ideal activation method was suggested by comparing the activation methods in terms of energy consumption. Mechanical activation of the pyrophyllite concentrate obtained by attrition scrubbing rather than froth flotation was suggested for higher recoveries of aluminum from by acidic leaching. It was determined that operating cost (in terms of energy) of the mechanical activation is lower and aluminum recovery is higher than thermal activation. It was concluded that mechanical activation instead of thermal activation is more economical and environmentally friendly method.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University Scientific Research Project Unit [2015/44G]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the Inoenue University Scientific Research Project Unit for supporting the study through Project No 2015/44G.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42461-023-00794-2
dc.identifier.endpage1343en_US
dc.identifier.issn2524-3462
dc.identifier.issn2524-3470
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162866871en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1333en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00794-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/101424
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001016117800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMining Metallurgy & Explorationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPyrophylliteen_US
dc.subjectAluminumen_US
dc.subjectLeachingen_US
dc.subjectThermal activationen_US
dc.subjectMechanical activationen_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_US
dc.titleAluminum Recovery by Acid Leaching of Variously Enriched Pyrophyllite Ore: Effects of Pre-treatment Methods for Activationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu