Heat conductive properties of set root canal sealers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKeleş, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X
dc.authoridOcak, Mevlüt Sinan/0000-0002-3121-2116
dc.authoridsimsek, neslihan/0000-0003-1142-9016
dc.authorwosidKeleş, Ali/J-5897-2015
dc.authorwosidOCAK, Mevlüt Sinan/V-9709-2018
dc.authorwosidOcak, Mevlüt Sinan/P-4906-2019
dc.authorwosidsimsek, neslihan/ABF-1071-2020
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAhmetoglu, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Mevlut Sinan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:37:34Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:37:34Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this study was to examine the thermal conductivity of five different root canal sealers in vitro. Materials and methods. Sealapex, AH Plus, AH 26, Endomethasone and RoekoSeal root canal sealers were examined. These materials were prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and applied to standard molds. Three samples of each material were prepared. The samples were kept for 5 days under 37 degrees C conditions. Measurements were taken using a heat conduction unit (P. A. Hilton Ltd. Stockbridge, Hants, UK). The thermal conductivity coefficient was calculated for each sample using the Fourier equation. Coefficients were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results. Significant differences were found for thermal conductivity between some materials (p < 0.05). The conductivity coefficient of AH Plus was found to be higher than those of the other materials (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between AH 26 and RoekoSeal (p > 0.05) and the conductivity coefficients of these sealers were found to be lower than those of the other materials (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between Sealapex and Endomethasone (p > 0.05) and the conductivity coefficients of these sealers were found to be lower than that of AH Plus but higher than those of RoekoSeal and AH26 (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The results showed that root canal sealers functioned as thermal insulators and had different heat-conductive properties that depended on their composition.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/00016357.2012.715202
dc.identifier.endpage755en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issue3-4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22900894en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84877298696en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage751en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.715202
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96052
dc.identifier.volume71en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000322832200056en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Odontologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectheat conductionen_US
dc.subjectheat insulationen_US
dc.subjectroot canal sealeren_US
dc.titleHeat conductive properties of set root canal sealersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu