Forearm Bones and Sexual Variation in Turkish Population

dc.authoridÜzün, İbrahim/0000-0002-7800-8657;
dc.authorwosidÜzün, İbrahim/D-7464-2019
dc.authorwosidCelbiş, Osman/ABE-2803-2021
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorIscan, Mehmet Yasar
dc.contributor.authorCelbis, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:35:38Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:35:38Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractForensic anthropologists are aware that there are considerable differences between human populations and therefore develop study models for each skeletal population. The purpose of this study was to analyze forearm bones obtained from forensic settings in Turkey. The sample consists of 42 males and 38 females with an average age of 40 and 36 years, respectively. Numerous measurements were taken from the radius and ulna including lengths (in millimeters), midshaft diameters, and epiphyseal breadths (0.01 mm). Individuals with any anomaly and pathology were not included in the investigation. A stepwise analysis, when applied to individual bones, selected only length and midshaft transverse dimension in the radius and length only in the ulna. When the length was excluded from the statistic, head diameter and distal breadth of the radius and distal minimum head and midshaft anteroposterior diameters of the ulna provided the best predicting functions. Classification results were 92% for the radius and 91% for the ulna. For the incomplete bones, the accuracy rates were about 92% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a sex determination was made, in different rates of accuracy, in the human skeleton. Correct assessment can vary among populations. Dimorphism in our region forearm bones is greater than American whites. This supported the hypothesis that human variation is diverse, and population difference should be taken into account when osteometric standards are applied to others. Further studies are needed to understand why the forearm is more dimorphic in Turks.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PAF.0b013e318219ca74
dc.identifier.endpage358en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-7910
dc.identifier.issn1533-404X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21546820en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-81855194428en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage355en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e318219ca74
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95494
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000297255600019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectforensic anthropologyen_US
dc.subjecthuman identificationen_US
dc.subjectforearm bonesen_US
dc.subjectradiusen_US
dc.subjectulnaen_US
dc.titleForearm Bones and Sexual Variation in Turkish Populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar