Forearm Bones and Sexual Variation in Turkish Population
dc.authorid | Üzün, İbrahim/0000-0002-7800-8657; | |
dc.authorwosid | Üzün, İbrahim/D-7464-2019 | |
dc.authorwosid | Celbiş, Osman/ABE-2803-2021 | |
dc.contributor.author | Uzun, Ibrahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Iscan, Mehmet Yasar | |
dc.contributor.author | Celbis, Osman | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-04T20:35:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-04T20:35:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Forensic anthropologists are aware that there are considerable differences between human populations and therefore develop study models for each skeletal population. The purpose of this study was to analyze forearm bones obtained from forensic settings in Turkey. The sample consists of 42 males and 38 females with an average age of 40 and 36 years, respectively. Numerous measurements were taken from the radius and ulna including lengths (in millimeters), midshaft diameters, and epiphyseal breadths (0.01 mm). Individuals with any anomaly and pathology were not included in the investigation. A stepwise analysis, when applied to individual bones, selected only length and midshaft transverse dimension in the radius and length only in the ulna. When the length was excluded from the statistic, head diameter and distal breadth of the radius and distal minimum head and midshaft anteroposterior diameters of the ulna provided the best predicting functions. Classification results were 92% for the radius and 91% for the ulna. For the incomplete bones, the accuracy rates were about 92% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a sex determination was made, in different rates of accuracy, in the human skeleton. Correct assessment can vary among populations. Dimorphism in our region forearm bones is greater than American whites. This supported the hypothesis that human variation is diverse, and population difference should be taken into account when osteometric standards are applied to others. Further studies are needed to understand why the forearm is more dimorphic in Turks. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318219ca74 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 358 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0195-7910 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1533-404X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21546820 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-81855194428 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 355 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e318219ca74 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/95494 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 32 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000297255600019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | forensic anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject | human identification | en_US |
dc.subject | forearm bones | en_US |
dc.subject | radius | en_US |
dc.subject | ulna | en_US |
dc.title | Forearm Bones and Sexual Variation in Turkish Population | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |