Evaluation of Sella Turcica Shape and Dimensions in Cleft Subjects Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authoriddedeoğlu, numan/0000-0003-0892-3654
dc.authoridocak, ali/0000-0001-5258-7200
dc.authoridduman, suayip burak/0000-0003-2552-0187
dc.authoridBAYRAKDAR, Ibrahim Sevki/0000-0001-5036-9867
dc.authorwosidYasa, Yasin/X-9099-2019
dc.authorwosiddedeoğlu, numan/ABH-2864-2020
dc.authorwosidocak, ali/GZL-2467-2022
dc.authorwosidduman, suayip burak/ABE-5878-2020
dc.authorwosidBAYRAKDAR, Ibrahim Sevki/Y-1232-2019
dc.contributor.authorYasa, Yasin
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Ali
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Suayip Burak
dc.contributor.authorDedeoglu, Numan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:42:47Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the morphology of the sella turcica and measure its size in cleft and noncleft subjects. Material and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 54 individuals (29 males; 25 females) with cleft and 85 (22 males; 63 females) without cleft were used for this study. Syndromic patients with cleft(s) were not included because of possible additional endocrinological and/or morphological disorders. Linear measurements included length, depth, and diameter. The shape of the sella turcica was analyzed in the cleft and noncleft groups. An independent t test was conducted to evaluate differences between genders and groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare age groups. Results: The length (p < 0.001) of the sella turcica was smaller in noncleft subjects than in cleft subjects. Diameter (p = 0.014) and depth (p = 0.005) showed as constantly increasing from an age < 15 to >25 years in the overall assessment. The distribution of the shape of the sella turcica differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, CBCT was used to assess the morphology of the sella turcica. A majority of the subjects with cleft had a flattened sella turcica compared to that of the control group. A shorter length of the sella turcica was more evident in the cleft subjects than in the control group. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000453526
dc.identifier.endpage285en_US
dc.identifier.issn1011-7571
dc.identifier.issn1423-0151
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27855395en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84995753147en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage280en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000453526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/97587
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000401811000011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Principles and Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCleft lip and palateen_US
dc.subjectMorphologyen_US
dc.subjectSella turcicaen_US
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Sella Turcica Shape and Dimensions in Cleft Subjects Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar