RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS: OUTCOMES AT A SINGLE CENTER

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridMELEKOGLU, RAUF/0000-0001-7113-6691
dc.authoridCOSKUN, Ebru INCI/0000-0003-4402-3725
dc.authoridKaraer, Abdullah/0000-0002-2010-6211;
dc.authorwosidYILMAZ, Ercan/AAA-1818-2021
dc.authorwosidMELEKOGLU, RAUF/AAF-1614-2019
dc.authorwosidCOSKUN, Ebru INCI/ABI-8238-2020
dc.authorwosidKaraer, Abdullah/ABI-4667-2020
dc.authorwosidköleli, ışıl/ABI-7318-2020
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Nurhan
dc.contributor.authorKoleli, Isil
dc.contributor.authorMelekoglu, Rauf
dc.contributor.authorTanrikut, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorFaydali, Simge
dc.contributor.authorKaraer, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:46:00Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:46:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe wanted to discuss our experiences in the approach to borderline ovarian tumors, which constitute a group different from epithelial ovarian tumors with respect to their biological structure in line with retrospective information gathered from our cases. A total of 25 patients operated on for the indication of adnexal masses diagnosed as borderline ovarian tumors based on frozen section results were included in our study. Patient age, tumor diameter, tumor markers and surgeries performed were discussed in the light of the literature. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software. The patient mean age was 43.84 +/- 11.34 years. The mass was localized in the right (n=13), left (n=11) or both (n=1) adnexal regions. The mean tumor diameter was 12.9 +/- 5.84 cm. Histopathologic examination established the diagnosis of serous borderline (n=14 patients) and mucinous borderline (n=11) ovarian tumors. Although the results of our study are consistent with current literature data, a greater number of current studies should be performed on borderline ovarian tumors, which are defined as a class of tumors different from epithelial ovarian tumors.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.04
dc.identifier.endpage36en_US
dc.identifier.issn0353-9466
dc.identifier.issn1333-9451
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31363322en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066827634en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98818
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000470874000004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSestre Milosrdnice Univ Hospitalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Clinica Croaticaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOvarian neoplasms, diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectOvarian neoplasms, classificationen_US
dc.subjectCystadenocarcinoma, serous, diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectCarcinoma, ovarian epithelial, diagnosisen_US
dc.titleRETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS: OUTCOMES AT A SINGLE CENTERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu