A comparison between the use of a monolateral external fixator and the Ilizarov technique for pelvic support osteotomies

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56249743200
dc.authorscopusid8325873300
dc.authorscopusid6602904476
dc.authorscopusid55907740100
dc.contributor.authorInan M.
dc.contributor.authorBomar J.D.
dc.contributor.authorKüçükkaya M.
dc.contributor.authorHarma A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:00:37Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: We compared the results of monolateral external fixator and the Ilizarov technique for pelvic support osteotomies in the treatment of neglected congenital hip dislocation. METHODS: Seventeen female patients with congenital dislocation of the hip underwent pelvic support osteotomy using a monolateral external fixator (MEF) (n=7; mean age 23.2 years; range 17 to 39 years) or the hybrid advanced Ilizarov method (HAIM) (n=10; mean age 25.9 years; range 17 to 36 years). The mean leg discrepancies, durations of the external fixator, and follow up-periods in the MEF and HAIM groups were as follows, respectively: 5.5 cm and 5.2 cm; 201.5 days (range 185 to 241 days) and 197 days (164 to 248 days); 30.4 months (23 to 39 months) and 40.5 months (21 to 65 months). The two groups were compared with respect to patients' discomfort related to the use of external fixators and pin tract infections classified according to the Paley criteria. RESULTS: Overall, six pins required removal because of grade 3 pin track infections (5 in the HAIM group, 1 in the MEF group). The number of patients who reported extreme discomfort for the use of external fixator was three in the HAIM group and one in the MEF group. Although the range of motion of the knee was similar in both groups (p>0.05), clinically, patients treated with MEF exhibited a more comfortable range of motion of the knee with external fixation and, after removal of the fixator, reached a knee flexion of 90 degrees in a shorter time (36 days versus 47 days). CONCLUSION: The use of MEF for pelvic support osteotomies seems to be preferable because it is associated with a lower rate of pin tract infections and a higher degree of patient comfort.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage260en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15618766en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-16644385069en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage252en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/90865
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcongenital hip dislocationen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectexternal fixatoren_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfemuren_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectIlizarov techniqueen_US
dc.subjectjoint characteristics and functionsen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectosteotomyen_US
dc.subjectpathologyen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative complicationen_US
dc.subjectradiographyen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectExternal Fixatorsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFemuren_US
dc.subjectHip Dislocation, Congenitalen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectIlizarov Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectOsteotomyen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articularen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleA comparison between the use of a monolateral external fixator and the Ilizarov technique for pelvic support osteotomiesen_US
dc.title.alternativePelvis destek osteotomilerinde tek tarafli eksternal fiksatör ile klasik Ilizarov tekniginin karşilaştirilmasi.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu