COMPARISON OF TVUS, MRI, AND FROZEN SECTION METHODS IN PREOPERATIVE DETECTION OF MYOMETRIAL INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

dc.authoridKaraca, Leyla/0000-0001-9150-3823
dc.authoridMELEKOGLU, RAUF/0000-0001-7113-6691
dc.authorwosidKaraca, Leyla/AAG-4002-2020
dc.authorwosidMELEKOGLU, RAUF/AAF-1614-2019
dc.contributor.authorKural, Hasim
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorMelekoglu, Rauf
dc.contributor.authorAkatli, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Leyla
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:51:57Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:51:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to evaluate the depth of myometrial invasion preoperatively with trans vaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and frozen section examination techniques in patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Our study included 65 patients. Transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in study patients in the preoperative period. Frozen section examination was performed in all hysterectomy samples obtained from all study patients. Data were analyzed with SPSS Statistics 22.0 program. The sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound in determining the depth of myometrial invasion was 88.64%, specificity 90.48%, positive predictive value 95.12%, and negative predictive value 79.17%. For magnetic resonance imaging, the sensitivity was 63.64%, specificity 95.24%, positive predictive value 96.55%, and negative predictive value 55.56%. In addition to the frozen section examination, which is the gold standard in determining the myometrial invasion depth, transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have become commonly used methods for this purpose in recent years. Ultrasound examination performed by an experienced specialist is superior to magnetic resonance imaging as it is fast, inexpensive, and associated with higher sensitivity.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.20471/acc.2021.60.04.15
dc.identifier.endpage682en_US
dc.identifier.issn0353-9466
dc.identifier.issn1333-9451
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35734482en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130572502en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage675en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.04.15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100667
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000791939600014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSestre Milosrdnice Univ Hospitalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Clinica Croaticaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial canceren_US
dc.subjectMyometrial invasionen_US
dc.subjectTVUSen_US
dc.subjectMRIen_US
dc.subjectFrozen sectionen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF TVUS, MRI, AND FROZEN SECTION METHODS IN PREOPERATIVE DETECTION OF MYOMETRIAL INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar