Is emergent cervical radiological evaluation mandatory in isolated cranial gunshot injury?
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2018
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accompanied cervical injuries of the patients presenting to the emergency department
(ED) because of penetrating, perforating or tangential cranial gunshot injuries (CGI).
Material and Methods: The retrospective study included 137 patients that presented to the EDs at Mustafa Kemal and Ataturk
University due to penetrating, perforating or tangential CGI between 2014 and 2018. Patients younger than 12 years old and had
insufficient radiological records were excluded from the study and thus 115 patients were included in the study.
Results: 115 patients included 105 (91%) men and 10 (9%) women with a mean age of 27 (range, 12-65) years. Of the 115 injuries, 84
(73%) were high-velocity and 31 (27%) were low-velocity gunshot injuries. The injuries included 92 (80%) penetrating or perforating
and 23 (20%) tangential injuries. No cervical dislocation injury was accompanied by CGI in any patient. Unilateral lamina fracture of
the cervical vertebra was observed in one patient.
Conclusion: Our results support the opinion that isolated penetrating, perforating or tangential CGI did not cause to cervical spinal
injuries, the intubation or tracheostomy procedures should not be postponed after radiological evaluation of cervical spinal stability.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynak
Annals of Medical Research
WoS Q DeÄŸeri
Scopus Q DeÄŸeri
Cilt
Sayı
Künye
Yilmaz, A., & Cakir, M. (2021). Is emergent cervical radiological evaluation mandatory in isolated cranial gunshot injury? . Annals of Medical Research