Evaluation of the ethics perception of academics in Inonu University faculty of medicine

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaynak, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:53:17Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:53:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis research was carried out to evaluate the ethics perception of academics working at İnönü University Faculty of Medicine. This is a descriptive study. The universe of the research consisted of 440 academics (Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors, and Research Assistants) working at Malatya İnönü University Faculty of Medicine. The sample size of the study was determined as 120 using power analysis. In total, 123 individuals were reached. The data were collected by face-to-face interviews with academics between July and October 2021, using the Personal Information Form and the Academic Ethics Scale. In the evaluation of the data, descriptive statistics and Kolmogorov Smirnov Test, the Levene test, the Mann Whitney Test, ANOVA, the Duncan test, and the Kruskal Wallis test were used. Any p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. It was found that 47.2% of the participants were research assistants, 50.4% worked for more than 5 years, 34.1% were between the ages of 31 and 40 years, 65% had clinical experience, 74% had national publications, 73.2% of them had sufficient knowledge about academic ethics (per their statements), 69.9% of them would notify authorities in case of unethical behavior, and 14.6% of them faced ethical violations. The participants' average perception of ethical values was 196.76 ± 16.27 [max: 260; Min: 155]. It was found that there was no significant difference between the ethical perception of the academics working at İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, and gender and the types of ethical violations faced. However, when age, clinical experience, and tenure were grouped under the Academic Ethical Values Scale sub-dimensions, there were significant differences. It was also determined that there were significant differences between the status of complaining about unethical behavior, title, knowledge about academic ethics, and having a national/international publication.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2021.03.058
dc.identifier.endpage1012en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-0634
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1007en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1131004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2021.03.058
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1131004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/89654
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the ethics perception of academics in Inonu University faculty of medicineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu