Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid7101877759
dc.authorscopusid7003344837
dc.authorscopusid6506166632
dc.authorscopusid6506242779
dc.authorscopusid55973192400
dc.authorscopusid6602807812
dc.contributor.authorSahin M.
dc.contributor.authorHasanoglu A.
dc.contributor.authorErbilen M.
dc.contributor.authorOrakçi V.
dc.contributor.authorBülbüloglu E.
dc.contributor.authorErtaş E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:59:21Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:59:21Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe prosthetic materials polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene were comparatively studied for postinterventional infection, development of adhesions, and recurrence of hernias and tissue reactions in rats in which abdominal defects 1 by 2 cm in size had been repaired with one of these materials. As regards infection and hernias there was no significant difference vs. a control group of rats. There was no collagen deposition in polytetrafluoroethylene, and the mononuclear inflammatory cell reaction and fibroblastic activity outside the graft layer were steadily less intense with polytetrafluoroethylene than with polypropylene. Adhesions were significantly (p < 0.05) more marked with polypropylene.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage295en_US
dc.identifier.issn0231-4614
dc.identifier.issue3-4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9262726en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0029420075en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/90542
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa chirurgica Hungaricaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectpolitefen_US
dc.subjectpolypropyleneen_US
dc.subjectabdominal wall musculatureen_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectanimalen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectforeign body reactionen_US
dc.subjectherniaen_US
dc.subjectpathologyen_US
dc.subjectraten_US
dc.subjectrecurrent diseaseen_US
dc.subjectsurgical equipmenten_US
dc.subjectsurgical infectionen_US
dc.subjectWistar raten_US
dc.subjectAbdominal Musclesen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionsen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectForeign-Body Reactionen_US
dc.subjectHerniaen_US
dc.subjectPolypropylenesen_US
dc.subjectPolytetrafluoroethyleneen_US
dc.subjectRatsen_US
dc.subjectRats, Wistaren_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Meshen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Wound Infectionen_US
dc.titleComparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu