The evaluation of agreement between the measurement methods used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer with the statistical methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYaşar, Şeyma
dc.contributor.authorYoloğlu, Saim
dc.contributor.authorAltıntaş, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAkatlı, Ayşe Nur
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Leyla
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:53:22Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:53:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to evaluate the compatibility of the "Computed Tomography (CT)" and "Magnetic Resonance (MR)" methods which are imaging techniques used to describe prostate cancer with the pathology accepted as the reference method. In this study, the concordance between CT and MR results and pathology results of 37 prostate cancer patients was evaluated using the Bland-Altman, Interclass Correlation Coefficient, Concordance Correlation Coefficient, Deming Regression and Passing-Bablok method comparison methods. Inter-class correlation coefficient and Concordance Correlation Coefficient values for CT-Pathology results were 0.62 and 0.62, respectively. Inter-class correlation coefficient and Concordance Correlation Coefficient values for MR-Pathology results were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. The regression equation for the Deming regression method is y=-6.21+1.03x for CT-Pathology, whereas for the MR-Pathology y=-6.86+1.11x. When the CT-Pathology measurement values are evaluated by the Bland-Altman statistical method, the mean values of the measurement differences are -2.42 and the standard deviation is 33.50. When the agreement between MR-Pathology measurement values is examined by the Bland-Altman method, the mean values for the difference between the measurement values are 4.14 and the standard deviation is 26.78. Among the applied methods, the Bland-Altman method is the most suitable method for data structure. According to the results of the Bland-Altman method, the tumor size obtained by the pathology method can be found to be 2.4 smaller than the mean values obtained from the CT results and an average of 4.1 cc from the measurement values obtained by the MR imaging technique.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2023.10.205
dc.identifier.endpage137en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-0634
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1244618en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.10.205
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1244618
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/89709
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of agreement between the measurement methods used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer with the statistical methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu