Comparison of two different Nasal Interfaces used in Non-Invasive Respiratory support in terms of Neonate comfort

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57283132500
dc.authorscopusid57208033236
dc.authorscopusid57773346600
dc.authorscopusid57195636045
dc.authorscopusid57195328067
dc.authorscopusid55391570100
dc.authorscopusid7003301157
dc.contributor.authorDeveci M.F.
dc.contributor.authorDag Y.S.
dc.contributor.authorAlagoz M.
dc.contributor.authorYasar S.
dc.contributor.authorYayan E.H.
dc.contributor.authorGokce I.K.
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:03:30Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is the first choice approach in neonates with sufficient respiratory effort that require respiratory support. The type of nasal interface used in NIV affects both efficacy and patient comfort. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different nasal interfaces used in NIV support on neonatal patient comfort. Methods Our study evaluated patients who received NIV support for 24 hours. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the type of nasal interface used, which were RAM cannula and short binasal prong (SBP). The patients’ demographic and clinical data were noted. Their sleep was monitored for 24 hours with an actigraphy device. Results A total of 82 patients were evaluated. The sleep efficiency in the RAM cannula group was significantly higher (respectively, 65.7% [10.22-95.25] vs. 57.81% [2.49-77], p=0.004). Although not statistically significant, the neonates in the RAM cannula group exhibited longer total sleep time (respectively, 10.4 ± 4.28 hours vs. 9.02 ± 3.73 hours, p=0.161). Comparison of heart rates and respiratory rates indicate that the patients in the RAM cannula group were more comfortable. Conclusions Our study found that infants who received NIV support through a RAM cannula experienced more efficient sleep. Holistic approaches in neonatal intensive care units are vital for better neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborns. Although non-invasive, the interface used in NIV should also be a part of this holistic approach. © 2024 Kamuzu University of Health Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4314/mmj.v36i1.7
dc.identifier.endpage47en_US
dc.identifier.issn1995-7262
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187901142en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage43en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v36i1.7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91861
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMalawi Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMalawi Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectActigraphyen_US
dc.subjectneonateen_US
dc.subjectRAM cannulaen_US
dc.subjectshort binasal prongen_US
dc.subjectsleepen_US
dc.titleComparison of two different Nasal Interfaces used in Non-Invasive Respiratory support in terms of Neonate comforten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu