Comparison of the proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid55323924900
dc.authorscopusid8861779800
dc.authorscopusid22956895300
dc.authorscopusid8098620700
dc.authorscopusid56543713700
dc.authorscopusid6604070029
dc.authorscopusid34569135700
dc.contributor.authorMukadder S.
dc.contributor.authorZekine B.
dc.contributor.authorErdogan K.G.
dc.contributor.authorUlku O.
dc.contributor.authorMuharrem U.
dc.contributor.authorSaim Y.
dc.contributor.authorMahmut D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:03:40Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe compared proseal, supreme, and i-gel supraglottic airway devices in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressures and airway morbidities in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. One hundred and five patients undergoing elective surgery were subjected to general anesthesia after which they were randomly distributed into three groups. Although the oropharyngeal leak pressure was lower in the i-gel group initially (mean ± standard deviation; 23.9 ± 2.4, 24.9 ± 2.9, and 20.9 ± 3.5, resp.), it was higher than the proseal group and supreme group at 30 min of surgery after the trendelenburg position (25.0 ± 2.3, 25.0 ± 1.9, and 28.3 ± 2.3, resp.) and at the 60 min of surgery (24.2 ± 2.1, 24.8 ± 2.2, and 29.5 ± 1.1, resp.). The time to apply the supraglottic airway devices was shorter in the i-gel group (12.2 (1.2), 12.9 (1.0), and 6.7 (1.2), resp., P=0.001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of their fiber optic imaging levels. pH was measured at the anterior and posterior surfaces of the pharyngeal region after the supraglottic airway devices were removed; the lowest pH values were 5 in all groups. We concluded that initial oropharyngeal leak pressures obtained by i-gel were lower than proseal and supreme, but increased oropharyngeal leak pressures over time, ease of placement, and lower airway morbidity are favorable for i-gel. © 2015 Sanli Mukadder et al.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2015/634320
dc.identifier.issn2356-6140
dc.identifier.pmid25802890en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84924347685en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2015/634320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92007
dc.identifier.volume2015en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific World Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectabdominal pressureen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectairway pressureen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectartificial ventilationen_US
dc.subjectbreathing rateen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcystectomyen_US
dc.subjectdevice comparisonen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfiberoptic bronchoscopyen_US
dc.subjectgynecologic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectgynecological laparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectlaryngeal masken_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmean arterial pressureen_US
dc.subjectmyomectomyen_US
dc.subjectoperation durationen_US
dc.subjectoropharyngeal leak pressureen_US
dc.subjectpHen_US
dc.subjectpulse rateen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectsupraglottic airway deviceen_US
dc.subjectsupreme supraglottic airway deviceen_US
dc.subjecttidal volumeen_US
dc.subjectuterine tube ligationen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectadverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectdevicesen_US
dc.subjectequipment designen_US
dc.subjectgeneral anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectgynecologic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoropharynxen_US
dc.subjectpressureen_US
dc.subjectyoung adulten_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Generalen_US
dc.subjectEquipment Designen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGynecologic Surgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectLaryngeal Masksen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectOropharynxen_US
dc.subjectPressureen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleComparison of the proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic surgeriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu