Prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival

dc.authoridtoktas, mahmut gokhan/0000-0001-9845-5481
dc.authoridAglamis, Erdogan/0000-0002-7497-7573
dc.authorwosidtoktas, mahmut gokhan/X-1923-2019
dc.authorwosidceylan, cavit/JVZ-8616-2024
dc.authorwosidAglamis, Erdogan/AAA-7464-2020
dc.contributor.authorAglamis, Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorToktas, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorUnluer, Erdinc
dc.contributor.authorTasdemir, Cemal
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Cavit
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:36:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survival. Material and methods: A total of 100 hundred patients were included in the study. Incontinent diversion was applied to 73 of these, and continent diversion to 27. Prospective and retrospective data of the patients were examined. The prognostic value for survival was evaluated for of lymph node involvement, tumor grade (low grade: grade 0-II, high grade: >= III or epidermoid carcinoma), tumor stage (low stage: stage pT0-2, high stage: stage >= 3a pT3a), presence of preoperative unilateral of bilateral hydronephrosis, presence of preoperative uremia (serum urea value: <= 60), and age (>70 and <= 70 years of age) on survival were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank statistical methods were used in the study. Results: Grade, stage, uremia, and lymph node involvement had significant effects on survival (p values 0.0002, 0.03, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). Presence of preoperative hydronephrosis and age had no statistically significant effects on survival (p values 0.8 and 0.2, respectively). Conclusions: Tumor grade, tumor stage, preoperative uremia, and lymph node involvement are prognostic factors affecting survival. Advanced age and presence of preoperative hydronephrosis have no prognostic value for survival. The presence of uremia in the preoperative assessment of the patients is more important than hydronephrosis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/aoms.2012.30288
dc.identifier.endpage654en_US
dc.identifier.issn1734-1922
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23056076en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866851202en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage650en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.30288
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95811
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308829800012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Medical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbladder canceren_US
dc.subjectradical cystectomyen_US
dc.subjectprognostic factoren_US
dc.titlePrognostic factors in radical cystectomy affecting survivalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar