Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: Evaluation of pain

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAtabekoglu, Cem Somer/0000-0003-0264-0709
dc.authoridKoc, Acar/0000-0003-2482-7478
dc.authoridTURKCUOGLU, ILGIN/0000-0002-8342-1956
dc.authoridSonmezer, Murat/0000-0001-6101-1414
dc.authorwosidAtabekoglu, Cem Somer/AAI-8767-2020
dc.authorwosidUysalel, Asuman/AAI-7166-2020
dc.authorwosidKoc, Acar/AAI-7513-2020
dc.authorwosidSonmezer, Murat/AAI-8964-2020
dc.contributor.authorAtabekoglu, C. S.
dc.contributor.authorTurkcuoglu, I.
dc.contributor.authorDuru, B.
dc.contributor.authorSonmezer, M.
dc.contributor.authorSuer, G.
dc.contributor.authorUysalel, A.
dc.contributor.authorKoc, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:32:49Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:32:49Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated the effect of closure or non-closure of parietal and visceral peritoneum during caesarean section (CS) on post-caesarean pain and analgesic requirement. A total of 94 primigravidas planned for elective CS were prospectively enrolled into closure (n = 46) and non-closure (n = 48) groups. Analgesia was provided by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) postoperatively. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Total dose of analgesics administered through PCA and times of analgesia demand and additional analgesics were also assessed. VAS and VRS scores were similar between the groups. The total dose of analgesics administered were similar (p - 0.095) between groups, however the mean number of analgesic demand (p = 0.020) and the additional analgesics (p < 0.001) were higher in the closure group. As a conclusion, the closure or non-closure of the peritoneum does not have any impact on postoperative pain intensity, however the analgesia demand and additional analgesia requirement decreases with non-closure.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/01443615.2011.560302
dc.identifier.endpage310en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615
dc.identifier.issn1364-6893
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21534751en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955631556en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.560302
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95315
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290147300008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCaesarean sectionen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectperitonisationen_US
dc.subjectVASen_US
dc.subjectVRSen_US
dc.titleClosure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: Evaluation of painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu