Effect of Abdominal Drain on Patient Comfort in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSumer, Fatih/0000-0002-0557-1369;
dc.authorwosidGundogan, Ersin/AFE-0184-2022
dc.authorwosidSumer, Fatih/F-8042-2017
dc.authorwosidKayaalp, Cuneyt/AAH-1764-2021
dc.contributor.authorGundogan, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorGokler, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorSumer, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cuneyt
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:49:25Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:49:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction:Sleeve gastrectomy is probably the most preferred morbid obesity surgery. It is important to provide patient comfort and early return to daily life after sleeve gastrectomy. Our aim was to investigate the effects of drain use on postoperative patient comfort. Materials and Methods:Fifty patients were randomly divided into two groups as no-drain and with-drain. The demographic characteristics and the intraoperative and postoperative findings of the patients were examined. Results:There were no differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative findings except visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Two patients (8%) in no-drain group required drain placement. In the intention-to-treat analyses of the drain and the no-drain groups (25:25), the VAS values were 4.3 +/- 1.9 versus 3.9 +/- 2.1 (p = 0.48), 2.4 +/- 1.4 versus 2.4 +/- 1.6 (p = 0.98), and 1.8 +/- 1.5 versus 0.9 +/- 1.0 (p = 0.01) on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days, respectively. In the per-protocol analyses (27:23), the VAS scores on the first 3 days were 4.3 +/- 1.9 versus 3.9 +/- 2.1 (p = 0.78), 2.4 +/- 1.4 versus 2.4 +/- 1.6 (p = 0.98), and 1.8 +/- 1.4 versus 1.0 +/- 1.1 (p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusions:Routine abdominal drain use in sleeve gastrectomy negatively affects postoperative patient comfort by increasing pain. Randomized controlled trials are needed about the requirement of routine drain use in sleeve gastrectomy.ClinicalTrials.govID: NCT04333979.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/bari.2020.0043
dc.identifier.endpage40en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-023X
dc.identifier.issn2168-0248
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102919208en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage36en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2020.0043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/99841
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000574558400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Careen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectobesityen_US
dc.subjectVASen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectminimal invasive surgeryen_US
dc.subjectbariatricen_US
dc.titleEffect of Abdominal Drain on Patient Comfort in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu