Which method for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia?; TAPP versus TEP

dc.contributor.authorAkturk, Remzi
dc.contributor.authorSerinsoz, Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T07:02:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T07:02:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study is to prove that the total extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP) method can be accepted as a standard method in elective and appropriate cases. Materials and Methods: Six hundred sixty-five (665/678) patients with an uncomplicated primary inguinal hernia who consented to participate in the study were randomized into two groups: Group I transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) repair and Group II TEP repair. Perioperative and postoperative complications and recurrence were detected with the help of radiology unit of our hospital and recorded. The patients were followed up for 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks.Results: The difference between the number of Tackers and return to work was significant (p0.05). While complications related to bleeding and anaesthesia were more common in TAPP (p0.05). A significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of all complications except for chronic pain, seroma of inguinal area, subcutaneous emphysema and testicular ischemia (p 0.05).Conclusion: It is indisputable that the TEP method is less invasive than TAPP. TAPP should still remain method used in the laparoscopic hernia learning curve for the pushing forward of laparoscopic anatomy vision and used for very complicated inguinal hernias such as the undescended testis and giant inguinal hernias.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAkturk, R., & Serinsoz, S. (2021). Which method for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia?; TAPP versus TEP . Annals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/55532
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleWhich method for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia?; TAPP versus TEPen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
3193-3200.pdf
Boyut:
651.82 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: