Comparison of propofol and ketamine + propofol in the induction of anaesthesia for caesarean section

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid35847280200
dc.authorscopusid7005742798
dc.authorscopusid6506462628
dc.authorscopusid55999519300
dc.authorscopusid18538188000
dc.authorscopusid7004585521
dc.contributor.authorAydin O.N.
dc.contributor.authorErsoy O.
dc.contributor.authorErsepciler M.
dc.contributor.authorEsmaoglu A.
dc.contributor.authorTercan E.
dc.contributor.authorBoyaci A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T19:59:42Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T19:59:42Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to investigate the effects of propofol and propofol + ketamine in the induction of anaesthesia for caesarean section on cardiovascular system in addition to adverse effects on newborn and the mother. Forty parturients aged between 18-35 years of ASA I or II were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I (n = 20) received propofol 2.5 mg/kg IV while Group II (n = 20) received ketamine 0.5 mg/kg IV + propofol 1.5 mg/kg IV. Systolic, diastolic and mean, arterial pressures (SAP, DAP, MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before induction and Immediately, 3 and 10 minutes following intubation. The duration from anaesthesia induction to delivery (I-D), from uterine incision to delivery (U-D) and APGAR scores at the first and fifth minutes were recorded. Awareness and discrimination abilities of the parturients were tested during and after the procedures. MAP decreased significantly immediately after the intubation while significant increases were observed at the 3 and 10th minutes. Group II revealed haemodynamic stability following induction and significant increases were recorded following and 3 minutes after intubation. There was a negative correlation between APGAR scores and I-D and U-D. Groups did not show significant differences with regard to awareness and discrimination abilities. Ketamine + propofol group provided better cardiovascular stability and the APGAR scores were higher in this group although not significant statistically. Ketamine and propofol were concluded to lessen cardiovascular side effects and to be of benefit.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage128en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0030902540en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage123en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/90838
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCaesarean sectionen_US
dc.subjectGeneral anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectKetamineen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.titleComparison of propofol and ketamine + propofol in the induction of anaesthesia for caesarean sectionen_US
dc.title.alternativeSEZARYENDE ANESTEZI INDUKSIYONUNDA PROPOFOL VE PROPOFOL + KETAMIN KULLANIMININ KARSILASTIRILMASIen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu