A randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidGökçe, İsmail Kürşad/ABI-8128-2020
dc.contributor.authorGokce, Ismail Kursad
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ramazan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:46:44Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:46:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In this study, we compared the efficacy of the RAM cannula and the short binasal prong (SBP) as noninvasive ventilation (NIV) interfaces in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Materials and Methods: Premature infants with RDS who required NIV were randomized in the RAM cannula and SBP groups within the first half hour. The groups were compared in terms of their need for invasive ventilation, their surfactant use, and their morbidities. Results: We assessed 126 patients (62 SBPs and 64 RAM cannulas). Clinical and demographic features of the groups were similar. Within the first 72 hours, the RAM cannula group showed a higher need for invasive ventilation (32.8 and 9.6%, p = .002, respectively), surfactant (42.1 and 19.3%, p = .007, respectively), and rate of pulmonary hemorrhage was also higher. There were no differences between the groups in terms of other morbidities. Conclusions: In preterm infants with RDS, RAM cannula use as an interface for NIV results in increased invasive ventilation and surfactant use.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [TSG-2018-1105]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study has been supported by the Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, project number [TSG-2018-1105].en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14767058.2019.1651268
dc.identifier.endpage1874en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-7058
dc.identifier.issn1476-4954
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31394948en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070511007en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1868en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1651268
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/98907
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480876600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNasal interfaceen_US
dc.subjectnoninvasive ventilationen_US
dc.subjectprematureen_US
dc.subjectRAM cannulaen_US
dc.subjectrespiratory distress syndromeen_US
dc.titleA randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu