Examining of acting on science and technology teacher’s professional burnout variables

dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, İlda
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Dilber
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T07:28:09Z
dc.date.available2018-02-22T07:28:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionİnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education Vol 17, No 2, 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims at investigating variables such as demographic, self-efficacy and competence that affect burnout of science and technology teachers; discovering relationship between these variables and revealing each other degree of explanation of these variables. Working group consists of 51 science teachers who work in Zonguldak. Survey model was used in the study. Single factor variance analysis (ANOVA), simple correlation and multiple linear regression were applied. In ANOVA application, although there isn’t a meaningful difference between “total burnout” means for “retirement”, “considerations concerning professional future” variables in terms of groups; there is a meaningful difference between “total burnout” means for reason of the teaching profession choosing variable. It was found that those who chose the profession for economic reasons exhausted more than who chose the teaching profession because of profession love; those who chose the profession for social reasons exhausted more than who chose the teaching profession because of profession love and those who chose the profession for economic reasons exhausted more than who chose teaching profession because he/she cannot find another job. There is intermediate level, negative and significant relationship between competence and total burnout; there is intermediate level, negative and significant relationship between confidence to performance and total burnout in correlation application. According to multiple linear regression analyze results, performance of regression is about 30% for “emotional exhaustion”, is about 38% for “depersonalization”, is about 29% for “personal success” and is about 58% for “competence”. Finally findings were discussed in the light of the related body of literature and some suggestions were made.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzdemir, İ., Polat, D. (2016). Examining of acting on science and technology teacher’s professional burnout variables. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education Vol 17, No 2, 2016.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage0en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/267729
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/8134
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherİnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.ispartofİnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectScience and Technology Teachersen_US
dc.subjectProfessional Burnouten_US
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectCompetenceen_US
dc.titleExamining of acting on science and technology teacher’s professional burnout variablesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
719.83 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: