The Place of the Peripatetic Tradition in Qutb al-Din Shîrâzî’s Illuminist Philosophy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57954100000
dc.contributor.authorEkinci G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:03:47Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:03:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to determine the place of the Peripatetic tradition in the Illuminist philosophy of Qutb al-Dîn al-Shîrâzî (d. 710/1311), an important scholar and philosopher of the 13th century known for his expertise in many fields. Shîrâzî wrote remarkable works on most of the sciences he learned and owes his real fame as a philosopher to the commentary titled Sharh Hikmat al-ishrâq, written on Suhrawardî’s (d. 587/1191) Hikmat al-ishrâq. Due to this work he’d written and the light-based emanation cosmology he adopted in it, Shîrâzî’s philosophy was generally identified with the Ishraqi/Illuminist school in the tradition of Islamic philosophy. However, Shîrâzî’s philosophy was versatile and unique with its different views. The Peripatetic school was another school that found a place both in the education and views of Shîrâzî, who succeeded at being the second most-referenced source after Suhrawardî. Shîrâzî criticized Aristotle (384-322 BC) and his followers, who were known as Peripatetics, because of their methods and the deficiencies he saw regarding some points. According to Shîrâzî, the Peripatetics were deprived of the argument of Illuminism by rejecting zevk [pleasure] and keshf [discovery] and relying entirely on demonstration and bahs [research]. Although Shîrâzî criticized the Peripatetics, he both benefited from them and used peripatetic terminology when necessary. Among the Peripatetics, Avicenna (d. 428/1037) was the philosopher Shîrâzî bestbenefited upon. This study reveals what share the Peripatetic philosophy had Shîrâzî’s Illuminist philosophy. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPeer-review: Externally peer-reviewed. Conflict of Interest: The author has no conflict of interest to declare. Grant Support: The author declared that this study has received no financial support.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/iuitd.2022.1116766
dc.identifier.endpage777en_US
dc.identifier.issn2717-6967
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141259532en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage755en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1135451en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1116766
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1135451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92102
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIslam Tetkikleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAvicennaen_US
dc.subjectIlluminismen_US
dc.subjectPeripateticen_US
dc.subjectQutb al-Dîn al-Shîrâzîen_US
dc.subjectSuhrawardîen_US
dc.titleThe Place of the Peripatetic Tradition in Qutb al-Din Shîrâzî’s Illuminist Philosophyen_US
dc.title.alternativeKutbüddîn Şîrâzî’nin İşrâkî Felsefesinde Meşşâî Geleneğin Yerien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu