Akademisyenlerin Akademik Etik Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Analiz
Küçük Resim Yok
Dosyalar
Tarih
2024
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
İnönü Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
This study aims to evaluate the academic ethics percep- tion of academics at a state university and to examine how this percep- tion is shaped according to various variables. This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a state university in Türkiye be- tween September and December 2023. The sample consisted of 126 academics working in different professional positions and volunteer- ing for the study. Data were collected using Personal Information Form and Academic Ethical Values Scale. 38.9% of the participants were fe- male and 61.1% were male, and there was no significant difference in academic ethical values scores according to gender (p>0.05). The mean academic ethical values of the academicians was 206.1±21.73 and their attitudes were evaluated positively. The highest score was found in the sub-dimensions of “values related to the teaching process” (62.16±6.53) and the lowest score was found in the sub-dimensions of “values re- lated to society” (29.25±2.32). Age positively affected scientific re- search values (p<0.05) and negatively affected teaching process values (p<0.05). Differences were observed in ethical values according to aca- demic titles and clinical experience (p<0.05). This study contributes to the understanding of the relationships between perception of academic ethics and various variables. The findings are valuable for identifying and implementing strategies to increase ethical awareness.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
ethics academician Academia academic ethics
Kaynak
Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etiği-Hukuku Tarihi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
32
Sayı
3
Künye
GÜVEN, G. Ö., KAYNAK, S., KARATAS, M. (2024). Evaluation of Academic Ethics Perceptions of Academicians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etiği-Hukuku Tarihi Dergisi , 32(3), 153 - 163. doi.org/10.5336/mdethic.2024-101576
