A Retrospective Evaluation of Serological Results of Cystic Echinococcosis Suspected Cases Admitted to Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital Between 2013-2020

dc.authorscopusid23979198800
dc.authorscopusid57952568400
dc.authorscopusid56094579400
dc.authorscopusid57193501488
dc.authorscopusid58564970900
dc.contributor.authorÇelik T.
dc.contributor.authorAlev C.
dc.contributor.authorAkgün S.
dc.contributor.authorGüldoğan E.
dc.contributor.authorŞahin F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:01:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:01:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is prevalent, especially in animals in Turkey and stands as a significant zoonose. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the indirect hemagglutination (IHA) tests results performed on samples of CE suspected patients in microbiology laboratory of our hospital. Methods: One thousand six hundred-seven files of patients admitted to hospital between January 2013 and December 2020 were examined for the presence of anti-E. granulosus immunoglobulin G antibodies. The patient’s socio-demographic characteristics and radiological data were obtained from the hospital automatization system. Results: A total of 1.607 file records; 644 (40.1%) males and 963 (59.9%) females, aged between 1-96 years (average 45.26±19.91) were examined. It was found that 244 (15.18%) of the patients were positive, 78 (4.86%) were determined at an intermediary value and 1.285 (79.96%) were negative. According to the IHA method a titer of 1/320 and above were evaluated as positive. Compared to anti-E. granulosus IgG antibody titers 164 radiological data; while 28.6% of 21 patients who are evaluated as negative (1/80) and 46.2% of 78 patients who were evaluated as intermediary titer (1/160) had cystic lesion in the radiological findings. Conclusion: Based on the data, it is suggested that while interpreting the patient’s serum antibody titers, patient’s clinical and radiological findings should also be taken into account. If possible, it should be used along with another serological method like ELISA to assist CE patient’s diagnosis and treatment. © 2022 Turkish Society for Parasitology.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/tpd.galenos.2021.29591
dc.identifier.endpage144en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-6320
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170022098en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage140en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid519612en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2021.29591
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/519612
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91240
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Parazitoloji Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCystic echinococcosisen_US
dc.subjectEchinococcus granulosusen_US
dc.subjectındirect hemagglutination assay (IHA)en_US
dc.subjectprevalenceen_US
dc.titleA Retrospective Evaluation of Serological Results of Cystic Echinococcosis Suspected Cases Admitted to Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital Between 2013-2020en_US
dc.title.alternativeAdıyaman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’ne 2013-2020 Yılları Arasında Kistik Ekinokokkozis Şüphesiyle Başvuran Olguların Serolojik Değerlendirme Sonuçlarıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar