Evaluating root and canal configuration of mandibular molars with cone-beam computed tomography in an eastern region of Turkish population

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid24544570800
dc.authorscopusid24830548100
dc.authorscopusid55543550800
dc.authorscopusid56323671700
dc.authorscopusid55347581500
dc.contributor.authorAhmeto?lu F.
dc.contributor.authorAltun O.
dc.contributor.authorŞimşek N.
dc.contributor.authorSinan Ocak M.
dc.contributor.authorDedeo?lu N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:03:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:03:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to examine the root canal morphology of mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography images of individuals living in the East of Turkey. Materials and Methods: The tomographic images of a total 183 patients attending the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department and clinical records were taken between 2011-2013 years were evaluated and clinical records. Root and canal diversities were classified according to the methods created by Vertucci and Gulabivala et al. Results: 173 first molar and 235 second molar teeth were examined among evaluated 155 patients. While the majority of the molar teeth had two separate roots (94.2% of the first molars, second molars 81.7%), three separate roots in first molars and second molars were found respectively 4.6% and 2.1%. Mesial roots of first molars with two separate roots showed type 4 canal configuration rate of 72.4%, whereas distal roots showed type 1 canal configuration rate of 69.3%. The Mesial root of the first molar teeth with three canals showed type 2 canal configuration (62.5%), the distal roots showed completely type 1 canal configuration (100%). The rate of 36% for type 4 canal configuration was detected in mesial roots and the rate of 95.8% for type 1 canal configuration was detected in distal roots of second molars with two canals. Type 1 canal configuration was most prevalent in the three rooted molars. Conclusions: While, two separate roots were most prevalent in each of two teeth groups, three separate roots were seen less frequent. Type 1 canal configuration was most prevalent in the distal roots, whereas the mesial roots had more complex root canal morphology and showed mostly type 4 canal configuration.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cdj.58140.1008002412
dc.identifier.endpage234en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84905983929en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage223en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid175652en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.1008002412
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/175652
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91885
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectMandibular molarsen_US
dc.subjectRoot and canal configurationen_US
dc.titleEvaluating root and canal configuration of mandibular molars with cone-beam computed tomography in an eastern region of Turkish populationen_US
dc.title.alternativeTürkiye'nin dogu bölgesi nüfusundaki mandibular molar dislerin kök ve kanal yapilarinin konik işinli bilgisayarli tomografi ile de?erlendirilmesien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu