Evaluation of tensile strength of different esthetic coping materials to Ti-base and monolithic zirconia crowns

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098;
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
dc.authorwosidyildirim avcu, guler/K-2278-2017
dc.contributor.authorSalginci, Irem
dc.contributor.authorYildirim Avcu, Guler
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:50:27Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:50:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the tensile strength of three aesthetic abutment materials at two different angulations (0 and 15 degrees) to Ti-base and monolithic zirconia crowns. Prefabricated polyvinylidene difluoride (Medentika Implant) abutments were obtained and zirconia (Kingch) and polyetheretherketone (Ceramill) copings were manufactured using a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system (n = 12). Bonding surfaces of the copings and Ti-bases were air-abraded with alumina and then metal primer was applied. Self-adhesive resin cement (Multilink Hybrid Abutment) was used for cementation of copings to Ti-base. The bonding surfaces of the monolithic zirconia crowns (Upcera ST ML) were air-abraded and crowns were cemented using self-adhesive cement (seT PP). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. No significant difference was found in the tensile strength of abutment to the crown interface for 0 degrees tapered abutments (p > 0.05). Regarding 15 degrees tapered abutments, the highest tensile strength values were obtained with zirconia abutments (p < 0.05). The tensile strength of monolithic zirconia crowns was lower than the restorations used in routine clinical practice.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University, Scientific Research Projects Unit, Turkey [2018/1187]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by Inonu University, Scientific Research Projects Unit, Turkey (2018/1187).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2021.1940655
dc.identifier.endpage904en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85111457318en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage895en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1940655
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/100074
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000677264300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbutmenten_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.subjectmonolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.subjectpolyetheretherketoneen_US
dc.subjectpolyvinylidene difluorideen_US
dc.subjectzirconiaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of tensile strength of different esthetic coping materials to Ti-base and monolithic zirconia crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu