Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuries

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKarakaplan, Mustafa/0000-0001-9035-0319
dc.authoridTasdemir, Zeki/0000-0002-7256-8485
dc.authorwosidKarakaplan, Mustafa/IXN-3318-2023
dc.authorwosidElmali, Nurzat/A-1017-2014
dc.authorwosidTasdemir, Zeki/AAM-5922-2020
dc.contributor.authorZehir, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorElmali, Nurzat
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorCalbiyik, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKarakaplan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTasdemir, Zeki
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:09:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study is to report our institution's experience regarding the use of open tibial inlay technique in patients undergoing single-stage combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Methods: Records of 17 patients who underwent PCL reconstruction with tibial inlay technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with ipsilateral femoral or tibial osteochondral avulsion fractures or ipsilateral concomitant tibia and femur shaft fractures were excluded. Out of these 17 patients, six cases underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + PCL reconstruction, nine cases underwent ACL+ PCL + posterolateral corner reconstruction, one case underwent ACL + PCL + MCL reconstruction and one case underwent ACL+ PCL + posterolateral corner + MCL reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 14.27 +/- 6.77 (range: 6-30) months. Results: In preoperative assessments, all patients had 3+ posterior laxity in posterior drawer test; at final follow-up, 6 patients had 0 laxity, 7 patients had 1+laxity, and 4 patients had 2+ laxity (p<0.001). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective evaluation showed severe disability in all patients preoperatively, whereas 5 knees were grade A, 8 knees were grade B, 3 knees were grade C, and 1 knee was grade D at final follow-up. Mean IKDC subjective score was 75.22 +/- 7.53 at final follow-up. Postoperatively, mean side-to-side difference in KT-1000 arthrometer measurement was 2.45 +/- 1.80 mm. At final follow-up, mean range of motion (ROM) was 0 degrees on extension and 123.56 +/- 6.31 degrees on flexion. Conclusion: Open tibial inlay approach is beneficial during PCL reconstruction. Further study is warranted to establish its effectiveness on functional outcomes and prevention of complications.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0443
dc.identifier.endpage585en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26511682en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84946415788en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage579en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid193507en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/193507
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92446
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000366021700002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnee ligament injuryen_US
dc.subjectposterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjecttibial inlayen_US
dc.titlePosterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu